Article View: alt.engineering.electrical
Article #15Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician")
From: Jerome Culik & Martina Culik Moo...
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 00:00
73 lines
4561 bytes
4561 bytes
Mike, and others who responded to this thread, I agree with Mike and the others that a PE is essential when you are consulting. The PE implies to the general public that you a competent in your profession (like the MD for doctors, DDS for dentist, VMD for vetinarians). As a general rule, civil engineers are the type of engineers that the general public interfaces with the most: consulting firms, city engineers, county engineers, etc. That is why the majority of the exams takers are civil engineers. I am a civil engineer and I am glad to see mechanical, electrica and other engineering disciplines get their professional engineering registration. Regards to all, Martina L. Moore, PE Mike Trimble wrote: > > In article <33EFA007.499@ll.mit.edu>, mmacdon@ll.mit.edu eloquently stated... > > > >Brian wrote: > >> > >> Look, if you do not have PE after your title, you are not a "real" > >> engineer. A BS alone in an engineering field does not qualify you to be > >> an engineer. > > > >Does this make me a "sissy" engineer? ;) > > > >I'll put a PE after my title when it makes some sense for me to do so. > >When I took the FE exam, most of the people I saw were civil engineers > >who were there because the PE is an important credential in that field. > >I half expect that if I were to take the PE exam in Electrical > >Engineering, this Microwave/Infrared guy would spend a lot of time > >boning up on the intricacies of Wye-connected and delta-connected power > >systems, since PE's in electrical engineering seem to be concentrated in > >the power systems field. The PE may make sense for consultants, but > >even then education and experience are the best indicators of ability. > > > >-- > >Mike MacDonald, MIT Lincoln Laboratory mmacdon@ll.mit.edu > >** The views expressed here are not those of Lincoln Laboratory. ** > > I concur that the P.E. is an ESSENTIAL credential in the consulting field. > While the the civil engineer is heavily represented in the consulting > engineering profession, there are also a great number of mechanical and > electrical engineers. Even in industry and education, obtaining professional > registration in ones field makes good sense. Particularly in education: In > college, invariably my best professors were P.E.'s with several years of life > experience to relate to their students. A pound of theory is fine, but I'll > take an ounce of life experience in a heartbeat. > > As for education being one of the BEST indicators of ability, do not delude > yourself and stick to experience. I have met numerous non-degreed technical > personnel that far outshined their graduate-engineer supervisors (yes, one was > even from MIT). > > Perhaps registration is not a requirement for your continued professional > growth. However, the exams are not that tough and (in my opinion) anyone > incapable of passing a P.E. exam has no business calling themselves an > engineer. > > M.L. Trimble, P.E. > Licensed to practice engineering in the states of Missouri and Illinois. > (Someday I'll get it right!) > NOTE: The return email address is a SPAM trap. > Remove ".spam" to reply -- MZďż˝
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33FDE474.31B6@brandywine.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <33EFA007.499@ll.mit.edu> <5soque$4qe$1@news2.ispnews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 116392,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid116392,public X-Google-Thread: fbe36,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe36,public X-Google-Thread: f8a7b,23ef9ba89231145f X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a7b,public X-Google-Thread: 10112a,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid10112a,public X-Google-Thread: f8959,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidf8959,public X-Google-Thread: 10d137,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public X-Google-Thread: 14b878,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid14b878,public X-Google-Thread: f4ca5,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidf4ca5,public From: Jerome Culik & Martina Culik Moore <culikmoore@brandywine.net> Subject: Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician") Date: 1997/08/22 Message-ID: <33FDE474.31B6@brandywine.net> X-Deja-AN: 268225334 References: <5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <33EFA007.499@ll.mit.edu> <5soque$4qe$1@news2.ispnews.com> Organization: eConnect Reply-To: culikmoore@brandywine.net Newsgroups: alt.engineering.electrical,alt.engr.dynamics,alt.engr.explosives,at.novell,comp.cad.pro-engineer,novell.compuserve.unixware,sci.engr,sci.engr.analysis,sci.engr.biomed,sci.engr.chem,sci.engr.civil