Article View: alt.engineering.electrical
Article #51Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician")
From: acs
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00
43 lines
2861 bytes
2861 bytes
acs <acs@silverlink.net> wrote in article <01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose>... > > > Brian <byeag@umr.edu> wrote in article <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu>... > > EricJNK wrote: > > > > > Yes, I sure can't understand how a salesman becomes "sales engineer". > > > > > > Why do we, real engineer, allow our title, "engineer", to become so > > > cheap and degenerated to a BS joke? I guess that explain why the > > > typical engineers are said to be a bunch of entroverts and nerds. > > > > Look, if you do not have PE after your title, you are not a "real" > > engineer. A BS alone in an engineering field does not qualify you to be > > an engineer. > > > As I understand things all a PE license allows one to refer to himself as > a "Professional > Engineer". A university degree in engineering allows one to refer to > himself as a "branch Engineer" where the branch may be Mechanical, Civil, > Electrical, Aerospace, etc.. > > Therefore in my opinion if someone has a degree in engineering whether or > not they have passed a PE exam they deserve to be called an engineer, but > not a Professional Engineer. > > Brian R. > BSME, BSEE, MSME, PE, SE, Mr. (since you guys seem so hung up on titles) > > > > P.S. It is possible for a person to pass the PE test based solely on work experience, ie there is no requirement for a university degree. To me this it is a very scary thought someone without a college education could be responsible for protecting the safety of the public, my family, and even myself based on their abilty to pass a test. >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bcac55$1ce37e80$66e181ce@snowgoose>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 116392,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid116392,public X-Google-Thread: 10d137,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public X-Google-Thread: fbe36,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe36,public X-Google-Thread: f8959,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidf8959,public X-Google-Thread: f4ca5,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidf4ca5,public X-Google-Thread: f8a7b,23ef9ba89231145f X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a7b,public X-Google-Thread: 14b878,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid14b878,public X-Google-Thread: 10112a,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid10112a,public From: "acs" <acs@silverlink.net> Subject: Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician") Date: 1997/08/19 Message-ID: <01bcac55$1ce37e80$66e181ce@snowgoose> X-Deja-AN: 267888087 References: <5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose> Organization: ACS INC. Newsgroups: alt.engineering.electrical,alt.engr.dynamics,alt.engr.explosives,at.novell,comp.cad.pro-engineer,novell.compuserve.unixware,sci.engr,sci.engr.analysis,sci.engr.biomed,sci.engr.chem,sci.engr.civil