🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.engineering.electrical
Article #51

Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician")

#51
From: acs
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00
43 lines
2861 bytes


acs <acs@silverlink.net> wrote in article
<01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose>...
> 
> 
> Brian <byeag@umr.edu> wrote in article <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu>...
> > EricJNK wrote:
> > 
> > >  Yes, I sure can't understand how a salesman becomes "sales
engineer".
> > >
> > > Why do we, real engineer, allow our title, "engineer",  to become so
> > > cheap and degenerated to a BS joke? I guess that explain why the
> > > typical engineers are said to be a bunch of entroverts and nerds.
> > 
> > Look, if you do not have PE after your title, you are not a "real"
> > engineer.  A BS alone in an engineering field does not qualify you to
be
> > an engineer.
> 
> 
> As I understand things all  a PE license allows one to refer to himself
as
> a "Professional 
> Engineer".  A university degree in engineering allows one to refer to
> himself as a "branch Engineer" where the branch may be Mechanical, Civil,
> Electrical, Aerospace, etc..  
> 
> Therefore in my opinion if someone has a degree in engineering whether or
> not they have passed a PE exam they deserve to be called an engineer, but
> not a Professional Engineer.
> 
> Brian R.
> BSME, BSEE, MSME, PE, SE, Mr.  (since you guys seem so hung up on titles)
> > 
> > P.S.  It is possible for a person to pass the PE test based solely on
work experience, ie there is no requirement for a university degree.  To me
this it is a very scary thought someone without a college education could
be responsible for protecting the safety of the public, my family, and even
myself based on their abilty to pass a test.
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <01bcac55$1ce37e80$66e181ce@snowgoose>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 116392,bbd0ea5f4744528e
X-Google-Attributes: gid116392,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d137,bbd0ea5f4744528e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public
X-Google-Thread: fbe36,bbd0ea5f4744528e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe36,public
X-Google-Thread: f8959,bbd0ea5f4744528e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8959,public
X-Google-Thread: f4ca5,bbd0ea5f4744528e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4ca5,public
X-Google-Thread: f8a7b,23ef9ba89231145f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a7b,public
X-Google-Thread: 14b878,bbd0ea5f4744528e
X-Google-Attributes: gid14b878,public
X-Google-Thread: 10112a,bbd0ea5f4744528e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10112a,public
From: "acs" <acs@silverlink.net>
Subject: Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician")
Date: 1997/08/19
Message-ID: <01bcac55$1ce37e80$66e181ce@snowgoose>
X-Deja-AN: 267888087
References: <5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose>
Organization: ACS INC.
Newsgroups: alt.engineering.electrical,alt.engr.dynamics,alt.engr.explosives,at.novell,comp.cad.pro-engineer,novell.compuserve.unixware,sci.engr,sci.engr.analysis,sci.engr.biomed,sci.engr.chem,sci.engr.civil