🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.engineering.electrical
Article #887

Re: difference between instrumental amplifier and operational amplifier

#887
From: Theron Hicks
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:00
61 lines
3540 bytes

Mike McCarty wrote:

> In article <8alm5q$g85$1@copland.udel.edu>,
> Ron Dozier <dozier@copland.udel.edu> wrote:
> )In article <89smse$fkl$1@news.cz.js.cn>, peter <asdc@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> )>Hi,can anyone tell me what's the general difference between
> )>instrumental amplifier and operational amplifier? what kind
> )>of application does each amplifier designed for?what kind of behaviors or
> )>characters we could expect when using them in application
> )>
> )
> )I'll tak a stab at this question.  An instrumentation amp geneally
> )amplifies the differnece between it's inputs in the presence of a large
> )common mode signal. They may have an extremely low bandwith.
>
> This is good.
>
> )
> )An operational amplifier on the other hand is a general purpose building
> )block and is single ended.
>
> This is wrong.
>
> )A typical use for an IA is thermocouple signal conditioning or bridge
> )amplifier and data acquisition where ground loops are a problem.
> )>
> )
> )Ron
> )
>
> The difference between an op-amp and an instrumentation amp is quite
> simple: an instrumentation amp is an optimized op-amp. It is normally
> built out of more than one op amp. It provides
>
>         low leakage
>         low offset
>         low drift (with temperature and time)
>         high common-mode rejection
>
> That's about it.

Now that is not exactly correct...
    An ideal instrumentation amp generally is a differential input amplifier that
provides fixed stable gain..  i.e. v_out=[(v_in_A)-(v_in_B)]*K
where K is usually fixed and _comparitively_ low ( say 1000 maximum)

An ideal Op Amp looks almost like that _but_ K is very high.

Also the corner frequency for an Op Amp is quite a bit lower (about 100 to perhaps
1000 Hz) than that of an instrumentation amp (hopefully greater than 1KHz to
perhaps as high as 100KHz or more).  Both devices have _roughly_ similar gain
bandwidths.

>
> --
> ----
> char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> I don't speak for Alcatel      <- They make me say that.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <38CE7B65.E07AE891@egr.msu.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <89smse$fkl$1@news.cz.js.cn> <8alm5q$g85$1@copland.udel.edu> <8alnpa$pki$1@relay1.dsccc.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109f9b,ad83af236ce47a65
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f9b,public
X-Google-Thread: 10026f,c4ce15d3e10cd212
X-Google-Attributes: gid10026f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d137,ad83af236ce47a65
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public
X-Google-Thread: 100bb0,c4ce15d3e10cd212
X-Google-Attributes: gid100bb0,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ad83af236ce47a65
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public
X-Google-Thread: 107cee,ad83af236ce47a65
X-Google-Attributes: gid107cee,public
X-Google-Thread: 1118be,ad83af236ce47a65
X-Google-Attributes: gid1118be,public
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,ad83af236ce47a65
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d0a,public
From: Theron Hicks <hicksthe@egr.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: difference between instrumental amplifier and operational amplifier
Date: 2000/03/14
Message-ID: <38CE7B65.E07AE891@egr.msu.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 597419090
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <89smse$fkl$1@news.cz.js.cn> <8alm5q$g85$1@copland.udel.edu> <8alnpa$pki$1@relay1.dsccc.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Michigan State University
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.engineering.electrical,cn.bbs.sci.electronics,misc.industry.electronics,misc.industry.utilities.electric,sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.misc