🚀 go-pugleaf

Well Steve, an isolated area (supposedly undesirable for human habitat)  was
the topic and  a particular part of Australia was the example.  I suggested
the moon as being totally ridiculous.  I serious doubt that given all the
money in the world that you could sustain life for a long period of time on
the moon at this time in human existence.    Either way, pack your bags and
move to either the moon or to that desolate part of Australia that gentleman
suggested. Never to return I might add.   Nothing was said about financing
your move or how you would live.  That's up to you.


"Steve Spence" <steve.spence@home.com> wrote in message
news:uHbS4.60889$R4.306571@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com...
> hmm... the moon, well I could make it livable, with enough cash, but the
> topic is Australia, and yes, I would do it just to prove it's possible.
> Isolation and desolation are relative terms.
>
> --
> --
> Steve Spence
> Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
> Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
> X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
> sspence@webconx.com
> (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
> If we don't believe in freedom of speech
> for people who we disagree with, we don't believe in it at all.
> --
>
> "codeman" <codeman@gj.net> wrote in message news:3918d1c8@news.gj.net...
> > Hmmm, give you a few hundred acres, anywhere, and you will move there?
No
> > matter how isolated and desolate it may be?   Is that right?   No
> > objections, no buts?   OK, I will give you a two hundred acres on the
> > "sunny" side of the Moon.  Go for it.
> >
> >
> > "Steve Spence" <steve.spence@home.com> wrote in message
> > news:e5SR4.58026$R4.291836@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com...
> > > give me a few hundred acres and I will. there has to be water a few
> > hundred
> > > feet down, and lots of sun for my pv panels. maybe some wind?
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Steve Spence
> > > Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
> > > Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
> > > X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
> > > sspence@webconx.com
> > > (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
> > > If we don't believe in freedom of speech
> > > for people who we disagree with, we don't believe in it at all.
> > > --
> > >
> > > "codeman" <codeman@gj.net> wrote in message
news:39176174@news.gj.net...
> > > > Reverse the question,  who would live there?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Steve Spence" <steve.spence@home.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:LWwR4.54953$R4.276555@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com...
> > > > > uninhabitable to whom?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --
> > > > > Steve Spence
> > > > > Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
> > > > > Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
> > > > > X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
> > > > > sspence@webconx.com
> > > > > (212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
> > > > > If we don't believe in freedom of speech
> > > > > for people who we disagree with, we don't believe in it at all.
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > "TJ" <tjlim@telpacific.com.au> wrote in message
> > > > > news:39162523@news.rivernet.com.au...
> > > > > > There is so much land that is totally uninhabitable in
Australia.
> > Why
> > > > > cannot
> > > > > > we allocate these sections to house these nuclear waste for
> sizeble
> > > > cost.
> > > > > We
> > > > > > sell these spaces and ensure that stringent standards are
imposed
> > for
> > > > > > dumping such waste here. There are lots of revenue from overseas
> to
> > be
> > > > > > earned here.
> > > > > > <none (Quarks like a duck)> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net...
> > > > > > > That is old thinking here in the US. Volunteer communities get
> > > > > > > educated too quickly on the industry's inabilty to solve the
> waste
> > > > > > > problem. I watched many low-level waste communities volunteer
> and
> > > then
> > > > > > > reject the idea soon after.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Ian Mair" <rimair@melbpc.org.au> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >The following paper has been added to the web site of the
> > > Australian
> > > > > > Academy
> > > > > > > >of Technological Sciences and Engineering. It may be viewed
by
> > > > > following
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >links from http://www.atse.org.au/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >"Some Aspects of the Relationship Between Society and the
> > Disposal
> > > of
> > > > > > > >Radioactive Waste", Mr Ian Duncan FTSE
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Society accepts that its demands for materials, energy and
> > > transport
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > >create wastes, and yet no community will willingly absorb its
> > share
> > > > of
> > > > > > > >waste, let alone accept a regional or national share.
Community
> > > > > rejection
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > >such a burden is exemplified by the NIMBY ('not in my
> back-yard')
> > > > > > > >phenomenon. Recent examination of NIMBY suggests that it
could
> be
> > > the
> > > > > > child
> > > > > > > >of 'top down' siting decisions usually based upon a 'decide,
> > > announce
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > >defend (DAD)' policy. There are indications now that a
counter
> > > > culture
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > >'volunteer communities' could mitigate or even overcome this
> > > > rejection
> > > > > > > >process.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>