Article View: alt.engineering.nuclear
Article #84Re: Disposal of Radioactive Waste
From: Don Libby
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00
63 lines
4319 bytes
4319 bytes
Tim O'Flaherty wrote: > > Greig Ebeling wrote in message <393e22ee.49400070@news.bigpond.com>... > >On Wed, 07 Jun 2000 02:10:05 GMT, kinsler@frognet.net (Mark Kinsler) > >wrote: > > > >>Greig Ebeling <greige@bigpond.com> wrote: > > Yet wind power schemes are > >theoretically able to produce no more than a few percent of our power > >before becoming uneconomical. > > What "theory" are you refering to? Do you have references and data to back > up this assertion? What specifically is "a few percent" ? 2%, 5%, 80% > ? "The levels of electricity generation from intermittent sources (for example from wind turbines or photovoltaic arrays) that can be accepted in a supply system depend strongly on the nature of the system and the measures that manage time variations in load. Typical percentages of wind or solar shares in systems without storage are about 20% for grid systems and up to 50% for large systems with reservoir based hydro or time zone variations of loads (Sorensen, 1981, 1987; Grubb and Meyer, 1993; Kelly and Weinberg, 1993). "Short-term storage will ease regulation and possibly improve power quality, but only intermediate and long-term storage will allow large systems to have shares of variable renewable-energy sources that significantly exceed 50% (Jensen and Sorensen, 1984). "The SUTIL simulation model (Kelly and Weinberg, 1993) calculates the average cost of electrric generation as the result of an hour-by-hour simulation that takes into account demand, the variable output of intermittent renewable equipment, the load-leveling capabilities of hydroelectric facilities, and the dispatching characteristics of alternative thermal-electric plants. Results of a SUTIL simulation of 10 alternative portfolios for a hypthetical utility--based on assumed values of the demand load profile, insolation, fuel costs, and capital costs--are shown in Figure 19-4. For this set of alternative utility investment portfolios... the fraction of electrical energy provided by intermittents can rise up to about 30%, without the use of new electrical storage technology, before costs start rising significantly." IPCC 1996 _Climate Change 1995: Impacts adaptations and mitigation of climate change_ pp. 617-619 Sorensen 1981 A combined wind and hydro power system. _Energy Policy_9(1) Sorensen 1987 Current status of energy supply technology and future requirements _Science and Public Policy_ 14 Grubb and Meyer, 1993 Wind Energy: resources, systems, and regional strategies. In Johansson et al. (Eds) _Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity_ Island Press, Washington DC Kelly and Weinberg, 1993 Utility strategies for using renewables. In Johansson et al. (op cit) Jensen and Sorensen, 1984 Fundamentals of energy storage. John Wiley & Sons, New York NY -dl
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<393E730F.2F71D6CD@tds.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <391C48E0.27163060@boeing.com> <N4mT4.40348$Xk2 <3939da71.57203458@news.bigpond.com> <1ai%4.1367$vV5.8002@newsfeed.slurp.net> <393e22ee.49400070@news.bigpond.com> <xys%4.7180$qS3.18260@tor-nn1.netcom.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ecc0,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ecc0,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: 102359,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid102359,public X-Google-Thread: fb19c,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb19c,public X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public From: Don Libby <no.spam@tds.net> Subject: Re: Disposal of Radioactive Waste Date: 2000/06/07 Message-ID: <393E730F.2F71D6CD@tds.net> X-Deja-AN: 632216817 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <391C48E0.27163060@boeing.com> <N4mT4.40348$Xk2 <3939da71.57203458@news.bigpond.com> <1ai%4.1367$vV5.8002@newsfeed.slurp.net> <393e22ee.49400070@news.bigpond.com> <xys%4.7180$qS3.18260@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@doit.wisc.edu X-Trace: news.doit.wisc.edu 960394007 10500 128.104.50.39 (7 Jun 2000 16:06:47 GMT) Organization: Replace "no.spam" with "dlibby" to reply by e-mail Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: no.spam@tds.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jun 2000 16:06:47 GMT Newsgroups: alt.engineering.nuclear,aus.environment.misc,aus.politics,sci.energy,sci.engr.mining,sci.environment.waste