🚀 go-pugleaf

Casey Noxon wrote:
> 
> Tom Shelly must pay for his lies and slander claiming
> innocent people are homosexual boy lovers, etc.  He has
> caused me great embarassment with my scouting activities, and
> has also threatened me by email.  This evil person has lost all
> rights to be on Usenet, as he is an out of control idiot who
> causes untold hurt to others.

He will...Directv DSL already has a letter from my attorney
requesting his identity.

On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 16:44:53 GMT, Casey Noxon <cnoxon@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>Tom Shelly must pay for his lies and slander claiming
>innocent people are homosexual boy lovers, etc.  He has
>caused me great embarassment with my scouting activities, and
>has also threatened me by email.  This evil person has lost all
>rights to be on Usenet, as he is an out of control idiot who
>causes untold hurt to others.



hahahahah!

haha
@@hhahaah
hahaha
hahahah
haha

hahaha


Tom Shelly, Undefeated White God

>
>He will...Directv DSL already has a letter from my attorney
>requesting his identity.


hahahaha!

hahahaha
h2whwhhahhaahah


Woooo.........woooooo.......I'm scared...

haha
hahahahaha
hahah

I will never let a child molesting pervert intimidate me.

hahahah
haha

(besides, you STILL  won't get my real name or address anyway...)

hahaha

hahaha

Tom Shelly, Undefeated White God

On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 14:37:25 -0500, James Riske
<apathy1@earthstink.net> wrote:

>>He will...Directv DSL already has a letter from my attorney
>>requesting his identity.
>
>You need a court order, and even with a court order it could take
>years to get any info out of them because they could make endless
>appeals..
>
>Didn't you see what happened with aol?
>Even after aol lost their court case they still refused to hand over
>any personal info about one of their members:
>
>AOL forced to reveal member's identity:
>
>State supreme court throws out first amendment defence
>By Paul Hales: Wednesday 04 December 2002, 16:55
>
>AOL IS TO BE FORCED to reveal the name of one of its subscribers
>following a ruling by the Virginia State Supreme court, reports state.
>
>AOL was asked to court to reconsider its findings, claiming the right
>to free speech was the real issue at stake, the Reporters Committee
>for the Freedom of Speech says.
>
>Hong Kong-based Nam Tai Electronics has sought to discover the
>identity of an individual who posted a message on a Yahoo! board which
>the company claims is libelous. The company is seeking compensation
>and punitive damages against the individual who it says was part of a
>plot to persuade investors away from the company.
>
>Nam Tai initially sought damages from Yahoo! in relation to the
>posting by scovey2 and 51 other individuals. Scovey2 called the
>company�s products "crap" in the posting. In the course of its
>investigations Nam Tai discovered that scovey2 is an AOL member and
>therefore asked the Virginia court � where AOL is based � to force it
>to disclose the posters� identity.
>
>The Virginia Supreme Court ruled at the beginning of November that AOL
>must disclose the identity of the poster, upholding an earlier circuit
>court decision.
>
>AOL spokesperson Nicholas Graham said AOL believes "very strongly
>[that its] members have protected free speech rights on an online
>media."
>
>Yet the lower court concluded in June 2001 that "the First Amendment
>privacy concerns of the anonymous defendant are outweighed by the
>State of California's interest in the ability of its litigants to
>conduct out-of-state discovery." In August, 2001 a Virginia court
>Chief Judge said that the First Amendment concerns did not apply to
>Nam Tai's claims of unfair business practices.
>
>AOL may yet take to case to the US Supreme court. "The information was
>not being supplied to them because we felt that the subscriber in
>question had a right to free speech on the service," Graham said. "We
>were going to court in order to ensure that our members had a right to
>free speech and right to privacy," he said. � 
>============================================
>Nobody ever defended anything successfully,
>there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
>--Gen George S. Patton




What's even funnier is that they don't even have my real name and/or
location.  

hahaha!~

Tom Shelly, Undefeated White God

"Tom Shelly, White God" wrote:

> >
> >He will...Directv DSL already has a letter from my attorney
> >requesting his identity.
>
> hahahaha!
>
> hahahaha
> h2whwhhahhaahah
>
> Woooo.........woooooo.......I'm scared...
>
> haha
> hahahahaha
> hahah
>
> I will never let a child molesting pervert intimidate me.
>
> hahahah
> haha
>
> (besides, you STILL  won't get my real name or address anyway...)
>
> hahaha
>
> hahaha
>
> Tom Shelly, Undefeated White God

            Tom sounds happy...he MUST have finally gotten into his
daughter's pants.


Paul

"Tom Shelly, White God" <tom_shelly_undefeated_white_god@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<30112v0rkm86ccag320ce97gl1hsvcd10n@4ax.com>...
> >
> >He will...Directv DSL already has a letter from my attorney
> >requesting his identity.
> 
> 
> hahahaha!
> 
> hahahaha
> h2whwhhahhaahah
> 
> 
> Woooo.........woooooo.......I'm scared...
> 
> haha
> hahahahaha
> hahah
> 
> I will never let a child molesting pervert intimidate me.
> 
> hahahah
> haha
> 
> (besides, you STILL  won't get my real name or address anyway...)
> 
> hahaha
> 
> hahaha
> 
> Tom Shelly, Undefeated White God

If I were in your shoes, I'd be sweating and shitting my trousers. 
You know how in virtually EVERY criminal case, they can track every
track and trail of a post? You didn't REALLY think that there was such
a thing as "anonymous" did you? Clearer cases of libel (against you)
do not exist.  Even with a marvelous attorney, you have really done
yourself in big time-provided anybody chooses to prosecute.

> 
> If I were in your shoes, I'd be sweating and shitting my trousers. 
> You know how in virtually EVERY criminal case, they can track every
> track and trail of a post? You didn't REALLY think that there was such
> a thing as "anonymous" did you? Clearer cases of libel (against you)
> do not exist.  Even with a marvelous attorney, you have really done
> yourself in big time-provided anybody chooses to prosecute.


Three problems with your threat.

1.) I have proof that the individuals I named did in fact commit the
offenses listed.

2.)  If you think I can be traced and that it's easy, you're an
amateur and don't know that the hell you are talking about.

3.)  Neither one of the individuals involved would want a public
lawsuit as it would expose them and the evidence that I have.


Now, crawl back into your hole netcop while I laugh at your ridiculous
attempt to  make me afraid.

hahahaha
hahaha

haha

Tom Shelly, White God

Are you gay?you seem like it.
              moo

tom_shelly_undefeated_white_god@yahoo.com (Tom Shelly Undefeated White God) wrote in message news:<c553d86e.0301151733.3f6c5ac3@posting.google.com>...
> > 
> > If I were in your shoes, I'd be sweating and shitting my trousers. 
> > You know how in virtually EVERY criminal case, they can track every
> > track and trail of a post? You didn't REALLY think that there was such
> > a thing as "anonymous" did you? Clearer cases of libel (against you)
> > do not exist.  Even with a marvelous attorney, you have really done
> > yourself in big time-provided anybody chooses to prosecute.
> 
> 
> Three problems with your threat.
> 
> 1.) I have proof that the individuals I named did in fact commit the
> offenses listed.
> 
> 2.)  If you think I can be traced and that it's easy, you're an
> amateur and don't know that the hell you are talking about.


I'M the amateur? LOL

By the way-paint your skin black red or whatever-you aren't fit to be a white.

track him down
every post he does he live his ip address or
the news provider  he is using
then you can report him to his ip or his news provider
if you need help in doing this icq me or email me at gigi7777us@yahoo.com

--
icq me at 214669150
or at my webpage at http://web.icq.com/wwp?Uin=214669150
and leave me a message
"Casey Noxon" <cnoxon@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3E204A1C.2BD5@earthlink.net...
> Tom Shelly must pay for his lies and slander claiming
> innocent people are homosexual boy lovers, etc.  He has
> caused me great embarassment with my scouting activities, and
> has also threatened me by email.  This evil person has lost all
> rights to be on Usenet, as he is an out of control idiot who
> causes untold hurt to others.