🚀 go-pugleaf

If people are going to go down this road then why don't they all use 512Kb 
Video cards? I mean you don't need all those colours either! The point of 
having something over 30fps is it's supposed to be very smooth (as well as 
being able to deal with more load without choking like huge rooms etc) and 
allows you to run games with higher detail settings rather than just scraping 
by at 25 or whatever with every texture blurred to hell and back.

On Tue, 12 May 1998 07:09:17 -0600, Jak Frust says...

>32fps is the fastest we can see.

>Alessandro wrote in message <01bd79b8$526472e0$3acd5ac3@-.hightek.com>...
>> 25fps is the fastest that the human eye can see over 25 fps
>>  you will not see any difference.. also why buing a V2 ?
>>ALEx

>>Willem van Riet <willemr@mweb.co.za> schrieb im Beitrag
>><354C6F12.CFD26EAE@mweb.co.za>...
>>> Its hardly the same game. I also have a 233 on a TX board, and when I
>>went from
>>> Voodoo1 to 2 I, suddenly got 42 Frames/sec at 800x600 vs 18 Frames/sec at
>>> 640x480
>>> on my Voodoo1.
>>>
>>> Dont worry about your crappy 2d card, its not used at all by 3dfx games.
>>>
>>> My results are on a CL 12MB V2, by the way.With all effects on and high
>>quality
>>> sound.
>>> I only have 40MB EDO Ram so you should see even better results!
>>>
>>> Go for it. You won't be dissapointed!
>>> -Willem
>>>
>>> Phil Webb [FLASH] wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm gonna get a 12MB voodoo 2 in a  couple of weeks (payday on it's
>>way) and
>>> > was wondering what kind of improvement it will give me in Quake.
>>> >
>>> > This is my spec:
>>> >
>>> >    P1 233 on TX board,
>>> >    Mystique 220 (ha ha, yes I do know how crap they are now, thanx for
>>> > telling me  8^}   )
>>> >    Diamond Monster 3DFX
>>> >    64 MB SDram
>>> >
>>> > I currently get aound 29-33 FPS.
>>> >
>>> > Can anyone with a similar spec who has upgraded tell me their results,
>>> > particularly with reference to playing at 800x600 or higher over the
>>> > Internet (Gamespy).
>>> >
>>> > Overlord [FLASH]