🚀 go-pugleaf

On 13 Jul 1997, Gary wrote:

> baits, moron

Much like masturbate, which you seen to do often.. Do you get off being a
prick?

> it is funny how funny the truth can seem

Yep. You obviously go to an inferior college, aswill be evidenced in my
next line reply. 

> no he isn't...  he isn't subscribed to rec...quake either...  just some
> asshole dipshit retard fucking quake player xposted it here

Well.. Lessee.. You seem to know a lot about the newsgroups he's
subscribed to. Do you look over his shoulder when he posts his pictures to
alt.binaries.erotica.children.gary?

> Quake sux.

Like yer ma ;)

> All I do now is run scripts for Quake.

Oooh.. You can write! Impressive. 

> Like on a server which allows infinte team changes:
> alias qwe "+jump;wait;-jump;wait;color 3;wait;qwe"
> qwe

Wow.. That might almost work! Wow.. you can gib yourself. You must really
be attention deprived arent you? Or maybe its just that you dont have a
girl/boyfriend? Hmm.. it could be that all GIT ppl are just inherent
Losers who coudnt get into a *good* tech school like WPI, and spend all
their time complaining on how sad and pathetic Quake is, yet still making
scripts and playing the game? "Look Billy-bob, I can gib myself! Arent you
proud?" 


> fun fun fun 

You are a sad sad little man. I almost pity you, but then I say to myself,
"Self, you are so far evolved from Gary's slithering form that he is not
worth your pity." So I cant pity you. But of course I caould always step
on you and save the gene pool some grief. 

> No... Intelligence is the correct word.  Knowledge is pointless for any game.
> The point is any idiot can play Quake; it takes a real person to play one
> of my favorite games like CHESS or BRIDGE.

Well, lets see. BRIDGE is a game which requires hours learning how to play
and reading books, heck we even have a column in our local newspaper about
the game. However, noting that BRIDGE lacks the fun of CHESS and the
appeal of BACKGAMMON, I dont play it. But I guess limited thought and
predictable bidding is what you are accustomed to, so again I withold my
pity on principle. As for CHESS, well this could be a redeeming arguement,
since Chess is a game requiring a lot of problem solving skills and
knowledge (NOT intelligence, any half wit can play CHESS, it takes a
Kasparov level of knowlege to master it) However, Quakers have Quess,
which, barring AI (Artificial Intelligence [defined for the git from GIT])
is a perfect copy of tabletop CHESS. You lose again.  


> Knowlege is the word he should have used

And it is something you should have flame-boy. 

> I have a marvelous proof for Goldbach's   |  Gary Yngve (gt5402a@prism)
> conjecture.  Unfortunately there is not   |  cello player, math nerd -  
> enough room in my sig to contain it.      |  what more could you ask for?

Ha ha ha.. That would be realy funny, but you see it was already done with
Fermat's last theorem and the margin of a book, so your witlessness shows
through. I suggest you go buy some, I hear that mute is selling his
clue-by-four in wpi.flame, or if your brain cant handle the war there, go
to the more tame alt.flame. 


SteelAngel - Physics/Music double major, what more can you ask for. 

--
http://homebase.res.wpi.net/promethium