Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #433Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative?
From: Colgate
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 04:56
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 04:56
68 lines
4140 bytes
4140 bytes
Who measured these receiving sensitivity? from a FCC certified lab or by the mfg? I don't know of any receiving sensitivity data on FCC database. I doubt D-Link 650(-84) beats Orinocol (-82). Colgate "Gary Funck" <gary@intrepid.com> wrote in message news:G8hB8.10545$JZ6.222335@dfw-read.news.verio.net... > > "AJ" <ajpk3@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:3cd566e4.10260543@news.pa.comcast.giganews.com... > > > > > > >This really make a lot sense, we have seen some AP or PCMCIA card rated > at > > >50 mW or above (only the cards with first generation Intersil chip limit > > >power to around 30mW) but the receiving sensitivity is unknown. While > some > > >card with low power output gets better range such as Orinocol. > > >There should be a way to identify the absolute performance of a card > based > > >on both TX and RX. This way we users could find out who is the real > > >performer. > > > > This page tells the rest of the story: > > > > http://freenetworks.org/moin/index.cgi/ReceiveSensitivity > > Sorting that (very informative) list by 11Mbs sensitivity, with lowest (most > negative) being better: > > Card 11 Mbps > Musenki (65mW output) (Has Anyone Seen this?) -87 > Cisco 350 Series (100mW output) -85 > smartBridges airNIC (USB, SMA connector, 32mW output) -84 > Enterasys / Cabletron (35mW) -84 > Netgear MA101 (USB 30mW) -84 > DLink DWL-650 -84 > Prism II Datasheet -84 > Proxim RangeLAN-DS -83 > Senao (100mW no EXT antenna) -83 > Cisco 340 Series -83 > Zcomax XI-300 -83 > Tellus AP -83 > Lucent Orinoco / Compaq WL110 (32mW) -82 > Intel 2011 -81 > Breezecom PC-DS.11 -80 > DLink DCF 650W/K (Compact Flash) -80 > Linksys WPC11 (20mW-100mW) -76 > Global Sun GL2411-02 (20mW-100mW) -76 > Teletronics 11mbps outdoor card -76 > SyncbyAir? -76 > Addtron AWP-100 -76 > > > That Musenki looks pretty darn good. By the way, in my own ad hoc testing, > I did find that the Netgear PCMCIA card outperforned the Orinoco Gold > (card), and the USR card (not ranked) above. > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<72oB8.5961$il4.776655933@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <3cd28a97.1926740@news-server.neo.rr.com> <eoCA8.10282$JZ6.213699@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <NeJA8.4997$2W3.551370928@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <PBWA8.10431$JZ6.218522@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <hpeaduob7gu87fuo8vqdodaisvnsk1m2g3@4ax.com> <83dB8.1431$n%4.488113293@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> <3cd566e4.10260543@news.pa.comcast.giganews.com> <G8hB8.10545$JZ6.222335@dfw-read.news.verio.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,64500d3ffd523aad X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-05 21:57:07 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Colgate" <colgate@myemail.com> Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet References: <hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <3cd28a97.1926740@news-server.neo.rr.com> <eoCA8.10282$JZ6.213699@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <NeJA8.4997$2W3.551370928@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <PBWA8.10431$JZ6.218522@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <hpeaduob7gu87fuo8vqdodaisvnsk1m2g3@4ax.com> <83dB8.1431$n%4.488113293@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> <3cd566e4.10260543@news.pa.comcast.giganews.com> <G8hB8.10545$JZ6.222335@dfw-read.news.verio.net> Subject: Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative? Lines: 70 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <72oB8.5961$il4.776655933@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.68.200.148 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1020660995 ST000 65.68.200.148 (Mon, 06 May 2002 00:56:35 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 00:56:35 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: TSU[@IONBZVMBPTYOBNNOFXBBZ\LPCXLLBWLOOAFEQR@ETUCCNSKQFCY@TXDX_WHSVB]ZEJLSNY\^J[CUVSA_QLFC^RQHUPH[P[NRWCCMLSNPOD_ESALHUK@TDFUZHBLJ\XGKL^NXA\EVHSP[D_C^B_^JCX^W]CHBAX]POG@SSAZQ\LE[DCNMUPG_VSC@VJM Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 04:56:35 GMT