🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.internet.wireless
Article #434

Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative?

#434
From: Steve Fenwick
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 05:09
59 lines
3783 bytes
In article <4sabdu0nrsaoutics25smu8adbrfpgo1ud@4ax.com>,
 Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:

> On 05 May 2002 06:57:31 GMT, Steve Fenwick
> <no-return-address@see-below.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >In article <5ch2duo9ims5jdvombhb577rpnvlbated9@4ax.com>,
> > Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 1 May 2002 14:40:21 -0700, "Gary Funck" <gary@intrepid.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >What is a TNC-R connector?
> >> 
> >> The FCC had this great idea that if they forced the manufactories to
> >> use non-standard connectors, people would be less tempted to add power
> >> amplifiers and external antennas.  Fat chance.  The TNC-R is a
> >> standard TNC connector, with the center pin as the opposite sex.
> >>     http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/connectors.html
> 
> >So, how do you think they (and other OEMs) avoid running afoul of the 
> >FCC Public Notice, DA 00-1087, dated May 22, 2000, that essentially 
> >makes RP-TNC (among others) illegal for Section 15.203 transmitters? Are 
> >they really using RP-TNC, or perhaps reverse thread TNC?
> >Steve
> 
> http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1087A1.txt

Yeah, that's the doc I was citing.

> Perhaps that explains why some manufactories (SMC, Linksys, Netgear,
> Bromax) are recycling the old model numbers with newer units?

:) C'mon, pull the other one!

> I've never seen a left hand threaded TNC until I noticed it on the
> HyperLink web pile.  Most of what I've seen are right hand threaded
> TNC connectors with reversed center pins known at TNC-R.

Cisco's site seems to refer to RP-TNC, which are specifically banned 
under the cited note, not left-handed TNC. So I wonder how they get away 
with it, particularly on obviously new models like the 1200.

> Perhaps what the FCC should do is simply outlaw the sale and
> distribution of such exotic connectors.  Then, there will be a
> replacement for the war on drugs.  Once connectors are scarce or
> unobtainable, one can make a substantial profit selling connectors to
> wireless users that need a fix or wanna get their antenna higher.
> Yeah, I see profits.  Great idea.

Story in future issue of "FBI Today": "Fugitive connector kingpin 
Liebermann caught in sting selling 20 gross of TNCs to dealers at West 
Coast hamfest; SBC's Powell cites as major victory for competitive 
forces in broadband networking."

Steve

-- 
Steve Fenwick     Anti-spammed address: steve (at) stevefenwick (dot) com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <no-return-address-51700F.22074905052002@nntp.concentric.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!sjc1.nntp.concentric.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!global-news-master
References: <hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <q89tcu8hplk5cqhoelav5i05no52r4o4f6@4ax.com> <RhZz8.9912$JZ6.205824@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <5ch2duo9ims5jdvombhb577rpnvlbated9@4ax.com> <no-return-address-634010.23572504052002@nntp.concentric.net> <4sabdu0nrsaoutics25smu8adbrfpgo1ud@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,64500d3ffd523aad
X-Google-Attributes: gid104fd2,public
X-Google-Thread: fa874,64500d3ffd523aad
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-05 22:09:15 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!sjc1.nntp.concentric.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!global-news-master
From: Steve Fenwick <no-return-address@see-below.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
Subject: Re: limited 802.11b range, SMC WAP/USR client, multiple WAPS, 802.11a as an alternative?
Date: 06 May 2002 05:09:11 GMT
Organization: Huh?
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <no-return-address-51700F.22074905052002@nntp.concentric.net>
References: <hlez8.20474$Yb1.48036@sea-read.news.verio.net> <q89tcu8hplk5cqhoelav5i05no52r4o4f6@4ax.com> <RhZz8.9912$JZ6.205824@dfw-read.news.verio.net> <5ch2duo9ims5jdvombhb577rpnvlbated9@4ax.com> <no-return-address-634010.23572504052002@nntp.concentric.net> <4sabdu0nrsaoutics25smu8adbrfpgo1ud@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.177.154.80
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)