Article View: alt.is.too
Article #13Re: NEW RULES about UseNet Complaints
From: M.Grubor
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:00
129 lines
5904 bytes
5904 bytes
In <4flekn$bbq@news.ios.com> mrdaleb@soho.ios.com (dale) writes: > >On Sat, 10 Feb 1996 04:24:57 -0500, DrG <manus@manus.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, David Veal wrote: >>> On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, CyberLogician wrote: >>> >>> > In article <4fd6bo$rgn@gaia.ns.utk.edu>, >>> > veal@web.ce.utk.edu (David Veal) wrote: >>> > > Assume for a second I reac something like rec.autos. >>> > >There's a message cross-posted for which the only group I read in its >>> > >newsgroup line is rec.autos. Now, the message is about Giant Killer >>> > >Hamsters From Outer Space. >>> > > >>> > > Why should I have to read it even once? >>> > >>> > You don't have to. Just ignore the thread. >>> >>> I have to spend sufficient time with it to know that it isn't what >>> I'm interested in reading. Further, the thread subject often has little >> >>What needed investigated about the "Giant Killer Hamsters?" >> >>> or nothing to do with where the topic is going. (Even worse, it may have >>> spawned off into multiple threads with the same subject line). >>> >>> Wouldn't it be a lot easier on everyone if people made an effort >>> to route their postings to groups of the appropriate subject? >>> >>So what? -- all newsgroups are public property. >>That means nothing to you. You route messages to the intended viewer! >> >>> > > A little courtesy on people's parts when it comes to newsgroups >>> > >lines will make things a lot more pleasant on everybody. This whole >> >>And the courtesy is to stay the fuck out of peoples' mailboxes when >>talking about any Usenet stuff. Usenet is a joke. E-mail is for business. >>Get them straight. >> >>> > >concept of proudly cross-posting to every group that comes to mind or has >>> > >ever been in the thread is certainly not very appealing. >>> > > >> >>That is not my concept. I post to only the relevant groups. >>However, that may be over 20 groups sometimes. >> >>> > so, tell the poster that in his home-newsgroup. >>> >>> In the first place there's no real way to tell what somebody's >>> "home group" is, assuming it has any meaning. (Newsgroups are defined by >> >>BULLSHIT! You KNOW that MY home.newsgroup is alt.is.too >>And newsgroups are defined by POPULATION even more than subject. >>It is the PEOPLE who frequent those newsgroups that make the rules, >>not some old stupid charter or FAQ. >> >>> subject, not by population. If you want to read about X, subscribe to >>> the groups about X. There's no basis to demand people route messages you >>> want to read to where you already read.) >>> >>Yes there IS a basis for that demand! The person SAYS so! >>If you do not know a person's home.newsgroup, then ask them! >>That is the way it goes from NOW ON! >> >>If you break the rules, both you and your ISP get mailbombed >>and attacked with virus and worms, dig? >> >>Now you take any FURTHER discussion of this issue to the >>GROUPS, where it belongs! Now any further infraction on your part >>are considered e-mail harassment at this address, ans ANY response >>will be justified and legal. >> >>John M. Grubor >>Doctor Of Law >>CyberLawMaster >>alt.is.too >> >>> -- >>> David Veal veal@utk.edu / veal@web.ce.utk.edu >>> >> >Oh yes, Lord Grube. May I get you a drink Lord Grube. I bow to you >Lord Grube....(read as 'fuck you!) O.K., but only if you are a cunt! "Lord Grubor" . . . hehehe . . . I like that one . . . I suppose it fits . . . LORDLY . . . lets see . . . I should be: Proud,large,imperious,grand,loud,magnificent,insolent,overbearing, dignified,arrogant,aristocratic,noble and just plain ME! Yep! It FITS! . . . but alas . . . I have already used the name. -- The Lordly Master Of The Mouthpiece, Sgt.Dr.Macho.GodFuckEsq. YES, I am SO glad that I QUIT the practice of law -- now those motherfuckers have NO jurisdiction over my mouthpiece any more! SgtDrMachoGodFuckEsq > With warm regards, > Dale Beaman > mrdaleb@soho.ios.com > >ABORTION.ABORTION.ABORTION.ABORTION.ABORTION.ABORTION. > >Fuck shit piss dick asshole cunt pecker pussy bastard >motherfucker & tits!!!! > >Join the Net Revolt by posting this in EVERY message or post. >Put this in your .SIG file. They cant throw us ALL in jail!!!! >Fuck those pussy fascist bastards. Most of them probably cheat >on their taxes, wives, and sold out to get where they are. >THIS is the 'Cabal' we should be writing about!!! >LIVE THE REVOLUTION!!!!!FUCK THE CDA!!!!!!!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4fne4p$p6i@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.BSD.3.91.960210040634.4038C-100000@terrazzo.lm.com> <4flekn$bbq@news.ios.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114b23,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gid114b23,public X-Google-Thread: 100ecf,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gid100ecf,public X-Google-Thread: faa05,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gidfaa05,public X-Google-Thread: f9437,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public X-Google-Thread: 10d980,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d980,public X-Google-Thread: 1085e3,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gid1085e3,public X-Google-Thread: 1046d5,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gid1046d5,public X-Google-Thread: 10f35e,cd48f91c79603308 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f35e,public From: zando@ix.netcom.com(M.Grubor ) Subject: Re: NEW RULES about UseNet Complaints Date: 1996/02/12 Message-ID: <4fne4p$p6i@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 139028812 references: <Pine.BSD.3.91.960210040634.4038C-100000@terrazzo.lm.com> <4flekn$bbq@news.ios.com> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Mon Feb 12 5:08:41 AM PST 1996 newsgroups: alt.is.too,news.groups,earth.general,soc.culture.russian,news.admin.policy,news.admin.net-abuse.misc,alt.censorship,alt.cyberspace,alt.2600,alt.culture.usenet,alt.is.not,alt.folklore.computer,alt.anarchy,news.admin.misc