🚀 go-pugleaf

Psick Pfreak Psycho Pstalker:
>Fagboi in a Leather Corset:  
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote:

>> [...]
>>> You started this, and I tried the threat of posting your unsolicited,
>>> unwanted email as an incentive to stop.

>> You posted personal email about an ex. That makes you scum. There is
>> no spin you can put on that that makes it even slightly acceptable.

>>>> Leave me alone. Completely. Both of you. And no, I am not trolling.

Victolly is mine! Psick Pfreak Psycho Pstalker makes kookthreat!

>>> This is usenet. Use your killfile. I'm not posting in any groups that
>>> I've not been posting in for months.

>>>> You are a vile and obnoxious harridan. Get out of my life once and
>>>> for all.

You are a psick pfreak psycho pstalker who cannot control his own
behavior. It surprises me to this day, even knowing how damaged some
of the people in this group are, that they tolerate your obnoxious,
obsessive behavior with your Berserker and your bots.

>>> I'm not in your life. This is usenet, as you keep telling me and
>>> everyone else. It's not real life.

>>> You've tried to run me off this group.

>> "This is usenet" "It's not real life"

>>> You set Lionel, your
>>> stalker-by-proxy, on me, and he hasn't stopped.

>> Nobody "set me" on you, Rodenta. I am attacking you because your
>> online behaviour makes me want to puke.

>>> But you expect everyone
>>> who is not on your side to stop.

>>> You want it over, make it over, but don't tell me that I have to stop
>>> when it still continues to my detriment.

>> As long as you continue posting to AUK, I will attack you. If you stop
>> posting to AUK, I for one, will stop attacking you. While you continue
>> to post here, there is nothing that you - or your forging, net-abusing
>> friends - can say or do that will stop me from giving you the
>> bitch-slappings that you've worked so hard to deserve.

>"But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist." <--- 100% 
>pure, unadulterated bunny-boiler logic. Damn those established patterns that 
>allegedly do not exist, Lionel.

>Anyway, to the point... following on from your idea of bitchslapping... I 
>was advised by AFP investigators to give a very clear warning message, which 
>could not be misinterpreted; they also laid out the possibilities and 
>options should the warning be ignored by one or the other or both, and they 
>indicated the time required to get the local case together and to petition 
>US authorities for their involvement. They also indicated what I can and 
>can't say so, other than saying:

>One has already impetuously ignored the clear warning and dismissed it out 
>of hand. The other does so at their own peril. The LART of the century may 
>be about to commence and I await the response of Michael Cranston. 
>Preferably there will be no response because he knows that I know what his 
>silence means. I can say no more.

This would be funny if you weren't so deranged.