🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:04:48 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:47:00 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
><spunky@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>>"Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:sogh7.k5f.17.1@news.alt.net
>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou that work for bread. Thou
>>> pinch-spotted, broken-backed owl. Ye incited:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:35:42 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>> <spunky@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> You started this, and I tried the threat of posting your
>>>>> unsolicited, unwanted email as an incentive to stop.
>>>>
>>>> You posted personal email about an ex. That makes you scum. There is
>>>> no spin you can put on that that makes it even slightly acceptable.
>>>>
>>>>>> Leave me alone. Completely. Both of you. And no, I am not trolling.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is usenet. Use your killfile. I'm not posting in any groups
>>>>> that I've not been posting in for months.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are a vile and obnoxious harridan. Get out of my life once and
>>>>>> for all.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not in your life. This is usenet, as you keep telling me and
>>>>> everyone else. It's not real life.
>>>>>
>>>>> You've tried to run me off this group.
>>>>
>>>> "This is usenet" "It's not real life"
>>>>
>>>>> You set Lionel, your
>>>>> stalker-by-proxy, on me, and he hasn't stopped.
>>>>
>>>> Nobody "set me" on you, Rodenta. I am attacking you because your
>>>> online behaviour makes me want to puke.
>>>>
>>>>> But you expect everyone
>>>>> who is not on your side to stop.
>>>>>
>>>>> You want it over, make it over, but don't tell me that I have to
>>>>> stop when it still continues to my detriment.
>>>>
>>>> As long as you continue posting to AUK, I will attack you. If you
>>>> stop posting to AUK, I for one, will stop attacking you. While you
>>>> continue to post here, there is nothing that you - or your forging,
>>>> net-abusing friends - can say or do that will stop me from giving
>>>> you the bitch-slappings that you've worked so hard to deserve.
>>>
>>> "But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist." <---
>>> 100% pure, unadulterated bunny-boiler logic. Damn those established
>>> patterns that allegedly do not exist, Lionel.
>>>
>>> Anyway, to the point... following on from your idea of
>>> bitchslapping... I was advised by AFP investigators to give a very
>>> clear warning message, which could not be misinterpreted; they also
>>> laid out the possibilities and options should the warning be ignored
>>> by one or the other or both, and they indicated the time required to
>>> get the local case together and to petition US authorities for their
>>> involvement. They also indicated what I can and can't say so, other
>>> than saying:
>>>
>>> One has already impetuously ignored the clear warning and dismissed
>>> it out of hand.

>>I await this with much eagerness.

>>You may let them know that I will cooperate fully in their 
>>investigation, including producing full chat logs as well as email and 
>>posts, and the entire contents of my computer, if so required. Luckily 
>>enough, I never reformatted, so it's all here, easily accessible, 
>>including full backups.

>None of which is worth much in court, if it hasn't been collected by
>means of a 3am swoop by the Fed's own IT forensics people, & not even
>then if the target is forewarned. This is because it's so incredibly
>easy to alter that kind of data post facto that even a total clubie
>like you could manage it.

Wrong, as usual.