🚀 go-pugleaf

Daniel J. Lavigne <taxfree@connection.com> wrote:
> 
> Thomas Scott <tscott@northpole.com> in Message-ID:
> <35C6908C.3161@northpole.com> wrote (comment is enclosed 
> between the extended arrows):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<snip>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> 
> To: <arion@greek.poets>
> 
> I have offered, in the past, to enter an exchange of 
> posts with regard to my strongly held beliefs that you 
> were responsible for a series of malicious attacks upon 
> myself.
> 
> I shall reserve the why and how that
> strongly held suspicion arose.

<snip>

> To another point. <tscott@northpole.com> closes
> his comments thusly:
> 
> ** If you accuse those who seek anonymity of cowardice,
> you accuse all those who vote by means of secret ballot
> of the same brand of cowardice **
> 
> I do accuse all who would participate in the practice
> of "secret ballots" of being afflicted by, and subject to,
> an overwhelming and, indeed, stenchful degree of cowardice.
> 
> It is due to that very cowardice by which the bastards of
> this world have led fools to permit AND PAY FOR(!) weapons
> that mock the very meaning of all life.
> 
> ie. All should learn that they MUST stand for what they
> believe and do so openly. We can no longer afford the luxury
> of lying to each other and believing our own lies. The very
> worth and meaning of "life" should dictate that bit of reality
> and deny us any other standard.
> 
> And I continue to maintain that all who post anonymously
> do so because of their lack of backbone and will to address
> and truly consider the "meaning of life" as it applies to them
> and their feelings of inadequacy when it comes to presenting
> their own viewpoint.
> 
> If I, a person of limited formal education, can learn to
> form and focus my thoughts in order to arrive at that which
> I firmly believe is to the constructive well being of all,
> no other dare whine to me that they "must" remain anonymous.
> 
> Indeed, when they understand the limitations and burdens
> that cowardice and the desire to speak from the shadows
> places upon them, they shall change their views and grow
> into adulthood.
> 
> Meanwhile, all others suffer their empty and meaningless
> rhetoric to no good individual or societal purpose.
> 
> I should need but to point out the openess of my campaign
> against societal insanity and the bastards and bureaucrats
> who would do, and have done, their best to mock all effort
> that is directed towards the waking of society.
> 
> If I, one who quite willingly stands alone and publicly
> confronts any and all with regard to my views, wherever
> the exchange of such views must take place, 

HAVE OPENLY TACKLED THE COWARDLY BASTARDS WHO WERE MORE 
THAN WILLING TO USE THE POWER OF THE STATE TO ATTEMPT TO 
SILENCE MY INSISTENCE THAT ALL MUST DEVELOP SPINE 
SUFFICIENT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES OF THE DAY, 

> the argument for anonymity goes flying out the nearest 
> window with the piss pot in which it first floated. 
> I thank you.

It seems as if I failed to complete the first sentence 
in the paragraph above. The inclusion, in CAPS after the 
comma following the word "place" represents the inadvertent 
ommission.

Note that attempts to deliver cc's to the two "concerned"
parties failed. Such should be considered an indication 
that anonymity has its costs.

ie. "Thomas Scott" could have received an immediate reply to 
his very first posting under that name, if he would but have 
shed the cowardice that leads him to plead that all should 
graciously accept the need of cowards to post anonymously.

Now, dearest little Tommy, who is "paranoid"; the party 
that dares not use its true name, or he who tells all, 
including cowards and the truly paranoid, where they can 
go with their little red wagons and crayons? Go away! Shoo!  
Scat! .  .  . And tell your mother to change your diaper!

As always,
 
taxfree
--
"Sheep never heed, their heads are too hollow 
 as meat for the markets, they simply follow."
--
Tired of supporting fools? Join the Tax Refusal!
<http://www.connection.com/~taxfree>