Article View: alt.security.pgp
Article #83Re: PGP
From: Matthew Lyle
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 15:08
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 15:08
21 lines
1454 bytes
1454 bytes
Marc VanHeyningen <mvanheyn@whale.cs.indiana.edu> writes:
>Thus said eoliver@ralph.cs.haverford.edu (Erik Oliver):
>>I found that its interface made PGPs look terrific, IMHO.
>Can you be more specific? What tasks did you find easier to perform
>using PGP? How exactly did you attempt to perform them with each?
>RIPEM takes a bit of customization to make work smoothly, and works
>much better with some mailers than others (which is the fault of the
>mailer.)
Sounds like an excuse to me. If you are creating a program that needs to
work with existing mailers you should architect it to do that.
I've not been impressed with RIPEM's user interface, and I've run it on
several platforms.
--
Matthew Lyle matt@oc.com
matt@utdallas.bitnet
OpenConnect System, Dallas, Texas (214) 888-0474
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan6.150836.1522@ra.oc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!mattReferences:
<1993Jan6.023852.2552@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <1993Jan6.050831.22326@netcom.com> <A2GWB31F@cc.swarthmore.edu> <1993Jan6.093413.17974@news.cs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: alt.security.pgp,alt.security.ripem Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!matt From: matt@ra.oc.com (Matthew Lyle) Subject: Re: PGP Message-ID: <1993Jan6.150836.1522@ra.oc.com> Organization: OpenConnect Systems, Dallas, TX References: <1993Jan6.023852.2552@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <1993Jan6.050831.22326@netcom.com> <A2GWB31F@cc.swarthmore.edu> <1993Jan6.093413.17974@news.cs.indiana.edu> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 15:08:36 GMT Lines: 21