🚀 go-pugleaf

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message 
news:55b5aa7c862bce7c740081936fe40779@pseudo.borked.net...
>>> It doesn't matter if it was.  A reply to the forgery was made by Susan
>>> Cohen, who was on the same service provider as KRP and even in the same
>>> time zone.  Her time-stamp shows that her post, which quoted and replied
>>> to
>>> the content in question, came before KRP's post.  So, unless both 
>>> Verizon
>>> and Google are in on some sort of conspiracy, the forgery came before
>>> KRP's
>>> post of the same material.
>>>
>>> I've asked him if he has any rational explanation on this.  Yesterday he
>>> basically said that it was difficult to keep his story straight, because
>>> of
>>> the fact that he didn't do it.  In my opinion he'd have a lot more
>>> credibility if he just admitted that he did it.  But, I am anxious to 
>>> hear
>>> if he has a *good* explanation for this.
>>
>>That isn't what I said. It is what you interpret what I said.  In any even 
>>I
>>did NOT write the forgery. And look more closely at both posts.
>
> Ok Ken:

> Explain to me how I could "interpret" this differently?

    You could START by seeing that I NEVER post from Anonymous remailers and 
David ALWAYS does.  You could look at this history, and even look at his 
website. If THAT doesn't place any questions in your mind, nothing will.

> Fact:  a post was made as a forgery through an anonymous remailer.

    Yep.

> Fact: eight hours later, the exact same post was made by you through your
> Verizon ID.

    Actually NOT 8 hours later.

> What is it that I should be looking closely at?  Your argument about the
> altered time stamps doesn't hold water, because other people responded to
> and quoted the first post.  One of them was even from Verizon and in your
> time zone.  You can't really cry "conspiracy" unless Verizon and Google
> were in on it as well.
>
> In my opinion you should just admit that it was you, and move on.

    Well if it was me I would, but it wasn't.