🚀 go-pugleaf

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message 
news:57cfb3fc62cdb03987cfd070e0244de9@pseudo.borked.net...

>>>    It's simple - we know who is doing it. Just monitor his net access.
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea of the issues and costs involved with such
>>> monitoring?
>>> If it's for something important, they may grant an order to monitor for 
>>> 30
>>
>>It isn't expensive to monitor somebody's use. That all runs in background
>>without human attention. They investigators scan through it to find the
>>traffic.
>>Keystroke for keystroke.
>
> And you don't think that having someone "scan through it keystroke for
> keystroke" is going to take time and resources?  Do you seriously think
> that taxpayers are going to want to foot the bill for something like this,
> because someone called you a name you didn't like or sent your wife an
> unsolicited e-mail?

    No - really not. First the software for capturing data are very 
effective. You can either look at images or text and you can do a "search" 
for key words via text.
The software is cheap. The time involved is minimal. In fact all one would 
have to do is document the posting to the remailers.  The actual text would 
take care of itself.

> Not to mention that if the subject of the monitoring has any type of good
> relationship with his ISP, they're going to advise him that he's being
> monitored anyway.

IF the ISP knows about it.  Do you mean to tell me that IF the Feds or cops 
get a WARRANT to monitor an individual that the ISP will WARN HIM?
You don't think that's a bit problematic?