Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
Article #100Re: 8250 vs. 8300 and RAID
From: Robert Johnson
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:55
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:55
58 lines
3355 bytes
3355 bytes
Currently the 8300 has the 530 FSB. I am waiting for the 800 FSB. Count Blah <nochance4spammers@server.com> wrote in article <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53>... > I'm with you Marcos. I've placed my order on the discounted 8250 with 2.8Ghz > on few days ago and cancelled it. Although it had a very good price I found > the following reasons to lean towards 8300: > > - RDRAM is twice more expensive and has to be installed in pairs (so I will > have only ONE expensive upgrade in the future); > - RDRAM will probably be abandoned in the future because newest Intel > chipsets support DC DDR SDRAM; > - Video slot is 8X AGP on 8300 vs. 4X on 8250. Which means that best video > cards will not be used to their full potential on 8250 in the future. > - 3.06 GHz with HT; > > I'm still not sure if the 8300 has 530Mhz or 800 Mhz front side bus speed. > Any info on that? > > > > "Marcos M. Zattar" <zattar@t-online.de> wrote in message > news:b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com... > > Hello! > > > > I am planning to buy a desktop from DELL and until yesterday I didn't > > have any doubt, I was up to the Dimension 8250. But then Dell launched > > a new model here in Germany, the 8300. It claims to be faster because > > it has the chipset 875P and 533/800 Mhz PSB. Besides, the RDRAM was > > replaced by the DDR. To make the choice more complicated, the 8300 is > > offered here in Germany with a regular hard-disk or optionally with a > > RAID couple instead (stripe or mirror, you choose). So here my > > questions: > > > > - How much is the increase in performance with the new chipset and RAM > > type? Is it worth spending those extra bucks for the newer version? > > - What are the advantages of a Serial-ATA harddisk compared to a > > regular EIDE harddisk? > > - It is said that RAID 1 (mirror) is safer regarding a possible disk > > failure and RAID 0 (stripe) is faster. How safer is RAID 1 and how > > faster is RAID 0? Is there really a considerable chance that in a RAID > > 0 system one of the disks fails, breaks or has a malfunction? In this > > case, is it true that you lose all your data? > > > > I would appreciate any comments that would help me decide which one to > > get. > > > > Bye! > > Marcos > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!elk.ncren.net!news.umass.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.avtel.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com> <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d683,e2de0a0b28bc5c97 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,e2de0a0b28bc5c97 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-28 09:57:48 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!elk.ncren.net!news.umass.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.avtel.net!not-for-mail From: "Robert Johnson" <robertjohnson999@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: 8250 vs. 8300 and RAID Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell,aus.computers.ibm-pc References: <b7hv2l$bga$00$1@news.t-online.com> <WDcra.675627$S_4.726350@rwcrnsc53> Organization: none Message-ID: <01c30da7$333de620$32f1fecd@micron> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 Lines: 58 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:55:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.254.241.50 X-Complaints-To: abuse@netlojix.com X-Trace: newsfeed.avtel.net 1051548950 205.254.241.50 (Mon, 28 Apr 2003 09:55:50 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 09:55:50 PDT