Re: SCSI, is Micron or Gateway better?

Article View: alt.sys.pc-clone.micron

Article #4

Back to alt.sys.pc-clone.micron Previous Next

From: Daniel Polfer
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 01:22

10 lines
866 bytes

In article <402vhd$jjp@comet.magicnet.net>, polfer@magicnet.net (Daniel Polfer) says:
>. . .
>bundle price for their 2GB Seagate Barracuda and 2940 was pretty good.
>. . .

Well, I messed up.  Thanks to Peter Diaz de Leon for pointing out that
the drive in my machine is actually a Seagate 32430N which is NOT a
Barracuda.  It is a Hawk 2LP.  Sorry for the misinformation...

Dan

Technical Details

Message-ID: <403psb$mpu@comet.magicnet.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.magicnet.net!usenet

References: <DCvJG1.H2L@mv.mv.com> <402qhr$ppq@panix.com> <402vhd$jjp@comet.magicnet.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.magicnet.net!usenet
From: polfer@magicnet.net (Daniel Polfer)
Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.micron,alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: SCSI, is Micron or Gateway better?
Date: 7 Aug 1995 01:22:18 GMT
Organization: MagicNet, Inc.
Message-ID: <403psb$mpu@comet.magicnet.net>
References: <DCvJG1.H2L@mv.mv.com> <402qhr$ppq@panix.com> <402vhd$jjp@comet.magicnet.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-01.magicnet.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+

Reply to Parent Message