Re: Can Sparc 1+ run Solaris 2.6 or later?

Article View: alt.sys.sun

Article #827

#827

From: Paul Eggert
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 00:00

6 lines
1373 bytes

>C. Newport <crn@NOSPAM.netunix.com> wrote:
>>Solaris 7 needs a *minimum* of 32M and needs at least 64M to run
>>at any reasonable pace.

I run Solaris 7 on a 24-MB ELC all the time, without any problem.
(Of course, I don't use CDE....)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <82uol2$a04$1@green.twinsun.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<01bf38b8$1e1fc640$LocalHost@cccf> <Pine.GSO.4.10.9912021020040.27779-100000@lios.apana.org.au> <829q3k$6am$1@hek.netix.org.uk> <82unjq$h8s$1@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4671,1736b68e775170db
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public
X-Google-Thread: f88e1,1736b68e775170db
X-Google-Attributes: gidf88e1,public
X-Google-Thread: 1070f0,1736b68e775170db
X-Google-Attributes: gid1070f0,public
X-Google-Thread: f6653,1736b68e775170db
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6653,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d053,2e8381c19c8c5713
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public
From: eggert@twinsun.com (Paul Eggert)
Subject: Re: Can Sparc 1+ run Solaris 2.6 or later?
Date: 1999/12/11
Message-ID: <82uol2$a04$1@green.twinsun.com>
X-Deja-AN: 559649227
References: <01bf38b8$1e1fc640$LocalHost@cccf> <Pine.GSO.4.10.9912021020040.27779-100000@lios.apana.org.au> <829q3k$6am$1@hek.netix.org.uk> <82unjq$h8s$1@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
X-Complaints-To: news@twinsun.com
X-Trace: tattoo.twinsun.com 944956898 18623 192.54.239.71 (12 Dec 1999 00:01:38 GMT)
Organization: Twin Sun Inc, El Segundo, CA, USA
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Dec 1999 00:01:38 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.sys.sun,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.misc,aus.computers.sun

Reply to Parent Message