🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:29:14 +0100, Alley00p <alley00p@mesazoic.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:36:29 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:35:23 +0100, Alley00p <alley00p@mesazoic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:47:22 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:40:45 +0100, (akula) <akula@sharks.plc.ltd> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:21:53 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a fast learner, Chris.  They're called binary groups.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Before necessary" what?  You get an 'F' in English.
>>>>
>>>> Short for "before it is necessary to do so", ffs.
>>>>
>>>
>>> (g) now, where oh where have I seen that 'ffs" used recently?
>>
>> There's an acronym site somwhere that'll help you newbies.
>>
>
> oh, for fucks sakes - we doan need no steenkin' afronym site - we jus'
> a-pointin' outz how familiar dat der "ffs" be fromz anuder
> poster/poser.
>
> (g) but yew knew that - jus' a-tryin to shuck us along now, weren't
> ya!

There is no telling what goes on in your silly little mind.

>>>>> People that regularly follow any binary group (I suppose you're
>>>>> referencing the many picture groups, whether porn or otherwise) read
>>>>> the chit-chat and they're done with it, especially considering that
>>>>> the vast majority of "chat" in a binary group consists of REQ:.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once that REQ: is filled, there is no need to retain the text.  Even
>>>>> still, most binary groups are comprised of an ever-changing population
>>>>> of posters and leechers.  That fact renders most 'conversations' in
>>>>> such groups meaningless after a few months at the most.
>>>>>
>>>>> Besides, most downloaders don't give a rat's ass about what some moron
>>>>> named RedDog who posts from a Verizon account thinks.  They are there
>>>>> to download pics and videos.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most busy binary groups or hierarchies, such as the .mp3 and warez
>>>>> hierarchies have their own discussion groups.  Many of the major porn
>>>>> groups have their own discussion groups, as do the mainstream movie
>>>>> groups, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given all the above, there is absolutely *no* reason to retain text in
>>>>> any binary group longer than the binary files themselves.  To do so
>>>>> would only serve to clutter up a BINARY group whose only purpose is to
>>>>> provide a means of sharing BINARY files, not text.
>>>>
>>>> Some groups aren't binary or text, they are BOTH.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah! no shit!
>>>
>>> idiot.
>>
>> It wasn't a statement it was a hint.
>>
>
> Yeah, well mine was a statemnet - IDIOT.

What's a statemnet?

>>>>> People don't subscribe to a BINARY group to look at the rants and
>>>>> raves of a control-freak named RedDog.  In such an instance, one DAY
>>>>> of retention is too long...and you would like to retain such idiocy
>>>>> for two YEARS or longer?
>>>>>
>>>>> As you are so fond of saying, Chris, once the reason(s) for
>>>>> subscribing to a group no longer exist, it will die (loose
>>>>> translation).  Clutter up a binary group with tons of old, meaningless
>>>>> text files dating back two years or longer and see what happens.
>>>>
>>>> How about looking for a solution to a problem with something in one of the many microsoft.* groups for example?
>>>>
>>>
>>> They have no problem - unless you're referring to yourself.
>>
>> You misunderstood my sentence, try again.
>>
>
> I understood it perfectly well - you only wish I didn't.

No, you twisted it around for a very feeble joke indeed.  Don't give up he day job.

>>>>> That is why first-rate NSPs expire text files along with binary files.
>>>>> Trust me, the issue has been well-thought out and researched by news
>>>>> admins with far superior intellects to yours, Chris.
>>>>
>>>> If he set everything to expire at the same time, I'd most likely leave for another provider.  I don't want the text disappearing very quickly just so people can get binaries for longer.  I might be on holiday for a couple of weeks for example.
>>>>
>>>
>>> asswipe, the time frame was "text files dating back two years or
>>> longer"
>>
>> So?
>>
>
> So?

So two years is better than two weeks.

Never wanted to refer back to something?

>>>> P.S. is your brain too small to fit two people in there?  I ain't Chris and never have been, you're almost as dimwitted as the two trolls in here.
>>>
>>> hey asswipe, is your brain large enough to fit two people in there?
>>
>> Using the same insult straight back is the work of a child.  Do try to grow up.
>
> I insist at keeping myself at your intellectual level.

That's a feeble excuse.

-- 
http://www.petersparrots.com    http://www.insanevideoclips.com    http://www.petersphotos.com

I checked into a hotel on a business trip and was a bit lonely so I thought I'd get me one of those girls you see advertised in phone booths when you're calling for a cab.
I grabbed a card on my way in.
It was an ad for a girl calling herself Erogonique, a lovely girl, bending over in the photo.
She had all the right curves in all the right places, beautiful long wavy hair, and long graceful legs all the way up to her armpits, you know the kind.
So I'm in my room and figure, what the hell, I'll give her a call.
"Hello?" the woman says. God she sounded sexy.
"Hi, I hear you give a great massage. And I'd like you to come to my room and give me one.
No, wait, I should be straight with you. I'm in town all alone and what I really want is s-e-x.
I want it hard, I want it hot, and I want it now. I'm talking kinky the whole night long.
You name it, we'll do it. Bring implements, toys, everything you've got in your bag of tricks.
We'll go hot and heavy all night; Tie me up, cover me in chocolate syrup and whip cream, anything you want, Baby.
Now, how does that sound?"
She says, "That sounds fantastic, but for an outside line you need to press 9."