🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:17:21 -0400, "(akula)" <akula@sharks.plc.ltd>
wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:59:15 +0200, NDJ <ndj@his.isp> wrote:
>
>>Someone - who could it be? - wrote madly:
>>(cut)
>>
>>> NDJ wrote:
>>>> Someone wrote:
>>
>>>>> You get an 'F' in English.  
>>
>>>>> People that 
>>
>>>> People who
>>
>>>>> regularly follow 
>>
>>>> follow
>>
>>>>> any binary group (I suppose you're referencing 
>>
>>>> referring to
>>
>>>>> the many picture groups, whether porn or otherwise) 
>>
>>>> groups)
>>
>>>>> read the chit-chat and they're done with it, especially considering that
>>>>> the vast majority 
>>
>>>> most
>>
>>>>> of "chat" 
>>
>>>> of it 
>>
>>>>> in a binary group consists of REQ
>>
>>>> is requests
>>
>>>> :.
>>
>>>> �
>>
>>>>> Once that REQ: 
>>
>>>> a request
>>
>>>>> is filled, there is no need to retain the text.  Even still, 
>>
>>>> �Qu�?
>>
>>>>> most binary groups are comprised of 
>>
>>>> have
>>
>>>>> an ever-changing population of posters and leechers.  That fact renders 
>>
>>>> So, 
>>
>>>>> most 'conversations' 
>>
>>>> conversations.
>>
>>>>> in such groups meaningless after a few months at the most.
>>
>>>> soon have no relevance.
>> 
>>>>> Besides, most downloaders don't give a rat's ass 
>>
>>>>> don't care 
>>
>>>>> about what some moron named RedDog who posts from a 
>>>>> Verizon account thinks.  
>>
>>>> who posters are, or what they think.
>>
>>>>> They are 
>>
>>>> They're
>>
>>>>> there to download pics 
>>
>>>> pictures
>>
>>>>> and videos.
>>
>>>>> Most busy binary groups or hierarchies, such as the .mp3 and warez
>>>>> hierarchies have their own discussion groups.  Many of the major porn
>>>>> groups have their own discussion groups, as do the mainstream movie
>>>>> groups, etc.
>>
>>>> There are many discussion groups,
>>
>>>>> Given all the above, 
>>
>>>> so
>>
>>>>> there is absolutely *no* reason 
>>
>>>> there is no need
>>
>>>>> to retain text in any binary group longer than the binary files themselves.  
>>>>> To do so would only serve to clutter up a BINARY group 
>>
>>>> Doing so only clutters a group
>>
>>>>> whose only purpose 
>>
>>>> the main purpose of which
>>
>>>>> is to provide a means of sharing 
>>
>>>> is to share 
>>
>>>>> BINARY 
>>
>>>> binary
>>
>>>>> files, not text.
>>
>>>>> People  
>>
>>>>Most people 
>>
>>>>> don't subscribe to a BINARY
>>
>>>> binary
>>
>>>>> group to look at the rants and raves of a control-freak named 
>>>>> RedDog.  
>>
>>>> to read inappropriate messages.
>>
>>>>> In such an instance, 
>>
>>>> for which
>>
>>>>> one DAY
>>									
>>>> one day
>>
>>>>> of retention is too long...and you
>>
>>>> long.  You
>>
>>>>> would like to retain such idiocy 
>>
>>>> want to keep it
>>
>>>>> for two YEARS 
>>
>>>> years
>>
>>>>> or longer?
>>
>>>> more?
>> 
>>>>> As you are so fond of saying, Chris, 
>>
>>>> As akula has pointed out,
>>
>>>>> once the reason(s) 
>>
>>>> reasons
>>
>>>>> for subscribing to a group no longer exist, it will die (loose
>>>>> translation).  
>>
>>>> die.
>>
>>>>> Clutter up a binary group with tons 
>>
>>>> a lot
>>
>>>>> of old, meaningless text files dating back two years or longer 
>>
>>>> of old text files
>>
>>>>> and see what happens.
>>
>>>>> That is why first-rate NSPs expire text files along with binary files.
>>>>> Trust me, the issue has been well-thought out and researched by news
>>>>> admins with far superior intellects to yours, Chris.
>>
>>>> Twaddle.
>>
>>>> C -
>> 
>>> How's it feel to be so totally owned, Chris?
>>
>>You have been misdirected: this is Remedial English.
>
>LOL!  That which follows a colon is to be treated as if it followed a
>period:  Double-space and capitalized.
>
>>For Lame you might try over at the AkOOkla Memorial Hall.  
>
>Mkay, kOOkie...er, I mean cookie.

The k00k claims his colon is constantly in need of treatment - you may
be right - he may be lacking in regular periods.