🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 06:58:32 +0100, (akula) <akula@sharks.plc.ltd> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:52:25 +0930, phlat�rse
> <phlat�rse@0lympic.icons.ret> wrote:
>
>> "Peter Hucker" <no@spam.com>, took a moment to utter:
>>
>> 	[edit_attrib reinstated]
>>> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:36:29 +0100,  phlat�rse <phlat�rse@0lympic.icons.ret>
>>> in <6l36b29f4o97ogjbmmrcdgsh7bkk4jo2lh@4ax.com>wrote:
>>>
>> 	[..]
>>>> Just to divert to something on topic for a mo'..are those estimates going to
>>>> hold for text in binary Groups, ya think?
>>>> Most all I have run across dump the text with the binary posts, same timeline.
>>>
>>> I would think so: I've noticed articles expiring at different times in the same group.
>>>
>> <nods>
>> Yeppas,, although I notice Chris (alt.net) has this to say:
>> MiD: <4vsuf.pup.17.1@news.alt.net>
>> <quote>
>> Correct.  Our expiration times are not based on group name, but rather are
>> based on article type (text/binary/size/# of parts).  For example, a text
>> message posted to alt.binaries.x will last as long as a text message
>> posted to alt.test.
>> 	[..]
>>  https://www.altopia.com/retention/retention.ht
>> <quote>
>> 	That statement is in variance with what I have found with other NSP
>> configs,,enquires made show no willingness to change their service/s. I use a
>> text service to read binary NGs for good reason, a policy akin to alt.net's,, as
>> a universal implementation,, would be a big help <shrug>
>> btw...that link has my config of 0pera
>
> You fucking kOOk...you're using Agent.

Maybe he's brighter than you and has figured out how to install more than one program.

-- 
http://www.petersparrots.com    http://www.insanevideoclips.com    http://www.petersphotos.com

Why doesn't DOS ever say "EXCELLENT command or filename"?