Article View: aus.comms.mobile
Article #106206Re: What if mobile phones are bad for your health?
From: Kym HORSELL
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00
47 lines
2758 bytes
2758 bytes
[This should be cross-posted to Aus.legal. But it wouldn't get an answer there, I'm sure. ;-)] John Leister <johndk@senet.com.au> writes: >Quick Question. >If ever it is proved that phones produce a health >effect no matter how small what would the legal >implications be for both sellers, manufacturers >and all? >Could this hurt the industry badly? Ah. Public liability. Another EAAASY question. ;-) It all depends on the national mood when and if we get to the point of showing there are effects. As per the tobacco industry, prosecutors's might tend to go for "when did [the industry] know there was research indicating there were ill effects, and what did you do about it?". It would then be interesting to observe (as some have) that the com industry in the present era seems not to publish or promote research on whether or not there are *any* effects (whether "good" or "bad") from mobile phone use. I think one SBS doc even indicated that at least one study in the past few years that showed alleged "beneficial" effects (claiming that mobile phone users were "more alert" after using their phones) was down-played by industry players because (it was argued by the program) it was "safer" for the industry to claim there was "no observed effect" than have consumers worry that "SOME affect has been demonstrated (now let's look for the bad ones)". But questions of damages (should that ever eventuate) are much less significant (apropos "damage to the industry") than a loss of public confidence in the products, given we've all been aware of numerous examples of hypthetically-similar things (i.e. some new product -- be it tobacco, asbestos, radium watch-dials, channel blockers, cocaine, etc) initially had "no know negative effects"; when millions are actually *using* them, THEN ill effects show up and there are whispers "they" "knew all along"). Loss-of-confidence can destroy a product; but (the net present value of ) future damages claims can be written off against current profits. -- R. Kym Horsell KHorsell@EE.LaTrobe.EDU.AU Kym@CS.Binghamton.EDU http://www.ee.latrobe.edu.au/~khorsell http://cs.binghamton.edu/~kym
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7qdak3$o4c$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<37C8DAEE.818D9D22@senet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,894c31c2c966d6fb X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public X-Google-Thread: fb718,894c31c2c966d6fb X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public From: kym@cs.mu.oz.au (Kym HORSELL) Subject: Re: What if mobile phones are bad for your health? Date: 1999/08/30 Message-ID: <7qdak3$o4c$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> X-Deja-AN: 518775041 References: <37C8DAEE.818D9D22@senet.com.au> Organization: Computer Science, The University of Melbourne Newsgroups: aus.comms.mobile,aus.general