Article View: aus.computers.java
Article #774Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???
From: Douglas Garstang
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:00
65 lines
3281 bytes
3281 bytes
I definitely do NOT have a javac in my bin directory! CHANDRASEKHAR JAKKAMPUDI <jakkampudi@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:8d9uof$c13g$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com... > > Look under jdk1.2.2\bin on Windows. All the executables including javac, > javap, java etc are right there. If you do not find them there I think you > need to re-install. If you are not able to call javac from your console, it > might mean that your path may not be set correctly. Try to compile by going > to the jdk1.2.2\bin directly. If you can do this, this confirms that your > Path is not correclty set. > > Douglas Garstang <doug@pobox.com> wrote in message > news:CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > Ken, > > > > Yup. I looked there. I only have a LIB and BIN directory. I even did a > 'dir > > *.exe /s' and still came up with nothing. > > *sighs* > > > > File downloaded was: jdk1_2_2-001-win.exe (20,449,862 bytes) > > > > Regards > > Douglas. > > > > Ken Wilson <ken.wilson@homeNOSPAM.com> wrote in message > > news:38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com... > > > Did you look in the directory "jdk1.2.2/bin"? I have downloaded the > > > Linux version and I believe the directory structure is the same as the > > > Windows implementation. > > > > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > I just downloaded and installed: > > > > > > > > JDK1.2.2-001 (ie Java 2 SDK) for Windows 98. > > > > > > > > According to the docs there should be a 'javac' included. > > > > > > > > There isn't!!! > > > > > > > > *very stressed* > > > > > > > > There's 'java'... but no compiler! > > > > > > > > What on EARTH have I missed this time? > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > > Douglas > > > > doug@pobox.com > > > > > > -- > > > Ken Wilson > > > First Law of Optimization: The speed of a non-working program is > > > irrelevant > > > (Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming') > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4A7K4.2047$1D.15867@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <8d9uof$c13g$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d6db,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d6db,public X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid113ae9,public X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public X-Google-Thread: f5d71,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,31923862481f16c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public From: "Douglas Garstang" <doug@pobox.com> Subject: Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ??? Date: 2000/04/16 Message-ID: <4A7K4.2047$1D.15867@news-server.bigpond.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 611683268 References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <8d9uof$c13g$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Complaints-To: news@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 955843968 144.132.128.98 (Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:12:48 EST) Organization: BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.net.au) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:12:48 EST Newsgroups: aus.computers.java,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.java.programmer