🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.computers.java
Article #775

Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???

#775
From: Douglas Garstang
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:00
61 lines
3129 bytes
I definitely do not have a javac in my BIN directory!

Chuck McCorvey <chuckm@solutionware.com> wrote in message
news:38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com...
> The install creates a c:\jdk1.2.2\bin directory by default.  I have
> installed this multiple times and it always puts it there.
>
> I just downloaded an installed (after cleaning out a previous install)
> the same file.   The javac and other executables are located in
> C:\jdk1.2.2\bin as they should be.  I've never seen this fail.  Perhaps
> you did something wrong?
>
> Chuck McCorvey
>
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
> >
> > Ken,
> >
> > Yup. I looked there. I only have a LIB and BIN directory. I even did a
'dir
> > *.exe /s' and still came up with nothing.
> > *sighs*
> >
> > File downloaded was: jdk1_2_2-001-win.exe (20,449,862 bytes)
> >
> > Regards
> > Douglas.
> >
> > Ken Wilson <ken.wilson@homeNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> > news:38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com...
> > > Did you look in the directory "jdk1.2.2/bin"?  I have downloaded the
> > > Linux version and I believe the directory structure is the same as the
> > > Windows implementation.
> > >
> > > Douglas Garstang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I just downloaded and installed:
> > > >
> > > > JDK1.2.2-001 (ie Java 2 SDK) for Windows 98.
> > > >
> > > > According to the docs there should be a 'javac' included.
> > > >
> > > > There isn't!!!
> > > >
> > > > *very stressed*
> > > >
> > > > There's 'java'... but no compiler!
> > > >
> > > > What on EARTH have I missed this time?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and Regards
> > > > Douglas
> > > > doug@pobox.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ken Wilson
> > > First Law of Optimization: The speed of a non-working program is
> > > irrelevant
> > > (Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
Technical Details
Message-ID: <gA7K4.2048$1D.16012@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d6db,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d6db,public
X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public
X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid113ae9,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a146,31923862481f16c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public
From: "Douglas Garstang" <doug@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Why is there no javac with JDK1.2.2-001 ???
Date: 2000/04/16
Message-ID: <gA7K4.2048$1D.16012@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
X-Deja-AN: 611683319
References: <fw_J4.1893$1D.14856@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8762A.A3D26F58@homeNOSPAM.com> <CP_J4.1907$1D.15164@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <38F8832E.9789EFA@solutionware.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Complaints-To: news@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 955843980 144.132.128.98 (Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:13:00 EST)
Organization: BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.net.au)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:13:00 EST
Newsgroups: aus.computers.java,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.java.programmer