Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #58297Re: Infomagic vs Redhat
From: Ken Yap
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 00:00
16 lines
1457 bytes
1457 bytes
|How is Metro-X better than XFree86? It's a proprietary port of XF86 and supports some servers that the free version doesn't. Matrox is one I think, they have an agreement with Matrox so they can get the technical info. It may also be better optimised for accelerated cards. This is what I hear, I don't have an accel card so I just used the free one. I think this is also the CD with Motif libraries. |I was told that the RedHat CD actually includes a book, |doesn't Infomagic include any printed material? The more expensive RedHat one does I think, the Archive CD doesn't. Not for $25. I wouldn't expect the Infomagic one to have a book for $25 either.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4qqiumINNcbn@degas.syd.dit.csiro.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4qlm2g$gf4@metro.usyd.edu.au> <4qnbf0$ai8@inferno.mpx.com.au> <4qovkc$pfs@metro.usyd.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102983,b409291f8be791bc
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: ken@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU (Ken Yap)
Subject: Re: Infomagic vs Redhat
Date: 1996/06/26
Message-ID: <4qqiumINNcbn@degas.syd.dit.csiro.au>
X-Deja-AN: 162219999
distribution: inet
sender: ken@syd.dit.csiro.au (Ken Yap)
x-nntp-posting-host: degas.syd.dit.csiro.au
references: <4qlm2g$gf4@metro.usyd.edu.au> <4qnbf0$ai8@inferno.mpx.com.au> <4qovkc$pfs@metro.usyd.edu.au>
x-face: bak'McMAD{%JrA$mQ(j_Ex_o?a/F8/Nt<W\sbPkh?,)PF7TK1{Lh"HJLuQfhE}(Dj!g:c(U =wh/r[<MJUF}hXzR*URO0e/Lh'mn_YUpU+;ycf6:0>ng*t2KX(NcfGalVs^Ke^C61:F
organization: CSIRO Division of Information Technology
reply-to: ken@syd.dit.csiro.au (Ken Yap)
newsgroups: aus.computers.linux