Article View: aus.computers.linux
Article #58595Re: Which Linux Distribution is better
From: Kent Tong
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1996 00:00
17 lines
1024 bytes
1024 bytes
hartr@hedunx.hedland.edu.au (Robert Hart) wrote: >I would suggest a long hard look at Red Hat (http://www.redhat.com). >This is a very well put together system and has a rapidly growing >userbase. We use it extensively here and found it a cleaner install than >any other distribution going. >It also has a very good packaging system that makes upgrading a snap. How much stuff does it include when compared to others? For example, does it include smalltalk and eiffel? --- Kent Tong Freeman Installer ==> http://www.netnet.net/users/freeman/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4p6vpf$f7a@metro.usyd.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4p3t2v$3e9@grumpy.fl.net.au> <4p5inu$sq5@kepler.hedland.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102983,e755e47e74a1f7cb X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: freemant@wr.com.au (Kent Tong) Subject: Re: Which Linux Distribution is better Date: 1996/06/06 Message-ID: <4p6vpf$f7a@metro.usyd.edu.au> X-Deja-AN: 158865856 distribution: inet references: <4p3t2v$3e9@grumpy.fl.net.au> <4p5inu$sq5@kepler.hedland.edu.au> organization: TipTec Development newsgroups: aus.computers.linux