🚀 go-pugleaf

Ian Timms wrote:
> 
> In message <5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au> - leonb@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au (Leon
> Brooks) writes:
> >
> > I am researching reasons for using the Michaelangelo virus instead
> > of Windows 95. Please Email any other reasons that you can think of.
> >
> [deletia]
> 
>   *  It takes nanoseconds to load and minutes to run, whereas Win95
>      takes minutes to load and hours/days to run.
> 
>   *  Installation is painless requiring only that you turn the power ON
> 
>   *  Doesn't come with a time wasting startup graphic
> 
>   *  It doesn't create immovable icons on your desktop, in fact
>      it is one of the few applications capable of removing them
> 
>   *  It doesn't make short cuts, it's all or nothing baby
> 

one thing they have in common is that for most people they are both
free. Most Windows users don't actually PAY for it

Regards

Michael Block

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  
        I AM BILL GATES OF BORG        
        STANDARDISATION IS IRRELEVANT
        USABILITY IS IRRELEVANT
        CHOICE IS IRRELEVANT
        PREPARE TO BE ASSIMILATED
        WE ARE MICROSOFT
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
resistance is not useless, join the Warp alternative, think for
yourself!
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/2265/

read about the Microsoft Shared Delusional Disorder.