Article View: aus.computers.os2
Article #30Re: Why Michealangelo is better than Win95
From: Ian Timms
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 1997 00:00
28 lines
1767 bytes
1767 bytes
In message <5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au> - leonb@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au (Leon
Brooks) writes:
>
> I am researching reasons for using the Michaelangelo virus instead
> of Windows 95. Please Email any other reasons that you can think of.
>
[deletia]
* It takes nanoseconds to load and minutes to run, whereas Win95
takes minutes to load and hours/days to run.
* Installation is painless requiring only that you turn the power ON
* Doesn't come with a time wasting startup graphic
* It doesn't create immovable icons on your desktop, in fact
it is one of the few applications capable of removing them
* It doesn't make short cuts, it's all or nothing baby
Cheers, Ian.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Ian Timms [Team OS/2] % Disclaimer: All opinions are %
% itimms@ibm.net % just that! Misconstrue at %
% DBA - Oracle, Ingres, Informix, DB2 % your own risk. ;-) %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<changi0.9m.2Fg5qf$01L@pixie.crcl.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a752,d77b7f389e7f13b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a752,public X-Google-Thread: 102983,d77b7f389e7f13b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: itimms@ibm.net (Ian Timms) Subject: Re: Why Michealangelo is better than Win95 Date: 1997/04/07 Message-ID: <changi0.9m.2Fg5qf$01L@pixie.crcl.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 231234961 Distribution: world References: <5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au> Organization: Crucial Applications Newsgroups: aus.computers.os2,aus.computers.linux