Article View: aus.computers.os2
Article #33Why Michealangelo is better than Win95
From: Leon Brooks
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:00
27 lines
1722 bytes
1722 bytes
I am researching reasons for using the Michaelangelo virus instead of Windows 95. Please Email any other reasons that you can think of. -cut-here---8<--------------8<--------------8<--------------8<---cut-here- Michaelangelo is better than Win95 because: * Installation is only one disk * You know exactly when it will wipe your hard drive * You don't have to remove it when you're finished using it * It uses less resources to run (it works on an 8088 with 64K RAM) * It won't slow down your network * It costs much less (free) * There is no such thing as a "half-dead" Michaelangelo system * Reformatting of your hard disk is done without user intervention * It will run with any version of DOS, even non-Micro$loth ones * It doesn't ask so many stupid questions * No wasted time with Solitaire, cute sounds or snappy bitmaps -cut-here---8<--------------8<--------------8<--------------8<---cut-here- aTdHvAaNnKcSe -=-=-=-=-=- Regards / Leon Brooks -=-=-=-=-=- Cold mud-springs in Wootton, UK, bubble up ammonites with the mother-of-pearl still on them, and bivalves with their ligaments intact. After 165 million years -- we are told by men with straight faces.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a752,d77b7f389e7f13b4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10a752,public X-Google-Thread: 102983,d77b7f389e7f13b4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: leonb@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au (Leon Brooks) Subject: Why Michealangelo is better than Win95 Date: 1997/03/26 Message-ID: <5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au> X-Deja-AN: 228745023 Organization: Diamond State Data Services Newsgroups: aus.computers.os2,aus.computers.linux