Article View: aus.computers.os2
Article #34Why Michealangelo is better than Win95
From: Michael Craft
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:00
21 lines
1556 bytes
1556 bytes
> I am researching reasons for using the Michaelangelo virus instead > of Windows 95. Please Email any other reasons that you can think of. > > Michaelangelo is better than Win95 because: > * Installation is only one disk > * You know exactly when it will wipe your hard drive > * You don't have to remove it when you're finished using it > * It uses less resources to run (it works on an 8088 with 64K RAM) > * It won't slow down your network > * It costs much less (free) > * There is no such thing as a "half-dead" Michaelangelo system > * Reformatting of your hard disk is done without user intervention > * It will run with any version of DOS, even non-Micro$loth ones > * It doesn't ask so many stupid questions > * No wasted time with Solitaire, cute sounds or snappy bitmaps Hey, I tried installing the Michaelangelo OS by compiling with MASM 5.1, but couldn't figure out how to port the damn source code from TASM. Michaelangelo could really catch on if better support were available from the programmers.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5hg23n$612@idiom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a752,d77b7f389e7f13b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a752,public X-Google-Thread: 102983,d77b7f389e7f13b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: jsi@idiom.com (Michael Craft) Subject: Why Michealangelo is better than Win95 Date: 1997/03/28 Message-ID: <5hg23n$612@idiom.com> X-Deja-AN: 228964498 References: <5h9tu7$cue@dsdata.DIALix.oz.au> Organization: JSI Newsgroups: aus.computers.os2,aus.computers.linux