Article View: aus.consumers
Article #8677Re: A good clock radio
From: Kathy Bloore
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 00:00
23 lines
1448 bytes
1448 bytes
In article <Wej1yAnFBh108h@home.melbpc.org.au>, ash@melbpc.org.au wrote:
>This is a recommendation as a consumer and I have no financial
>interest in the topic.
>
>I was fed up with the poor quality of potentiometers ("volume
>control" in this case) found in clock radios. I rarely
>adjusted the volume on my clock radio, yet the control would go
>scratchy very quickly, i.e. at certain settings there was no
>volume.
<snip>
It is refreshing to see that other people have problems with clock radios too!
Thinking a good brand name might make a difference, I bought a Sony clock
radio, duty-free for $70 a couple of years ago and it doesn't even have the
extra features you mention of your new $59 one. The volume control is so
touchy, it is either non-audible or louder than required to regain
consciousness in the morning! I won't mention how loud the buzzer
is (no volume control on this)....suffice to say it never gets set, else I
bolt upright in mortal fear at 6.00am, nothing like a headache to start the
day!
Kathy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5beqfv$dgq$1@pithy.mincom.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Wej1yAnFBh108h@home.melbpc.org.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a0c5,bf6d356056b19846 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a0c5,public From: kathyb@mincom.com (Kathy Bloore) Subject: Re: A good clock radio Date: 1997/01/14 Message-ID: <5beqfv$dgq$1@pithy.mincom.oz.au> X-Deja-AN: 209943840 references: <Wej1yAnFBh108h@home.melbpc.org.au> organization: Mincom Pty Ltd newsgroups: aus.consumers