🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:08:45 +1000, "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com>
wrote:

>
>"Robert" <RB@..> wrote in message 
>news:o55533ljbtou5i8crch0b9lfud4l8j27sq@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:25:50 +1000, "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@removeozdebate.com>
>> wrote:

>Wait a sec - I'll try a variation on your 'pyro' argument and see how things 
>go....
>
>> These things are priced on what people will pay.
>
>And people scream about paying $150 a tonne for firewood, hippy fuckwit.

They'll be paying a lot more soon.

>> Petrol produces 11000 kwh/tonne... or about 1300 litres.
>>
>> You pay about $1600 for that.
>> So a KwH produced from petrol is costing 15cents...roughly the same as our
>> domestic electricity or gas.
>
>No shit, hippy fuckwit?

can't do the sums yourself eh, dummy?

>> You can get it from forest litter or woodchip
>
>Which costs a lot more to gather, store and distribute , hippy fuckwit.

I can collect a tonne by hand in no time at all. It's worth at least $50 raw.

>> at a fraction of that price.
>
>Wrong. People would only be *willing* to pay a cheaper price but it would 
>cost more to gather, store and distribute, which is why it's not economicaly 
>viable, hippy fuckwit.

If it's economically viable to go into the forests, collect tree trunks and
transport them all the way to a pulp mill in order to virtually give the stuff
away to the Japs, then it is also perfectly economical to collect litter that
can be made into fuel and sold for ten times the price of pulp.

>>>> Incidentally, that goes for woodchip too...that we sell to the Japs for
>>>> about
>>>> $30 a tonne.

>>>> You could run a steam car for a year on ten tonnes of it....
>>>
>>>It'd be more economical to get methane gas from this ridiculous turd of a
>>>post of yours.
>>
>> Can't do the sums, eh, Dummy?
>> I'm not going to keep doing them for you.
>
>Pity that none of your sums have proven your idea to be economically viable, 
>hippy fuckwit.

still can't do any sums eh, moron?

>>>> YWhy not? What the hell are CSIRO and the Universities for.....nursing
>>>> homes
>>>> for useless academics or simething?
>>>
>>>ROFL. You really are a mindless fuckwit.
>>
>> Have they ever done anything useful?
>>
>
>Well, unless you consider reducing the risk of heart disease, making 
>significant advances in cancer treatment and holding patents crucial to 
>wireless communications 'useless', I would say they have definitely done 
>some useful work, hippy fuckwit.

I take that to mean you have recently given up smoking.