🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.environment.misc
Article #224

Re: What's wrong with geothermal?

#224
From: Trevor Wilson
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:25
58 lines
3415 bytes
"Jo Schaper" <jospamnotschaper34@5socket78dot9net> wrote in message 
news:12pglrue2531268@corp.supernews.com...
> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> "netvegetable" <dontemailme@all.com> wrote in message 
>> news:en9564$pdb$1@news-02.connect.com.au...
>>> On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:41:07 +0000, Jo Schaper wrote:
>>>
>>>> netvegetable wrote:
>>>>> While the PM is trying to debate whether or not we should start to go
>>>>> nuclear in 10-15 years, various private firms are steaming ahead in 
>>>>> their
>>>>> research and development of geothermal energy via "hot dry rocks" 
>>>>> ......
>>>>>
>>>>> So tell me what's wrong with this form of energy as an alternative to
>>>>> coal?
>>>> Do you have a large nearby source of water? Water or some other medium
>>>> still has to be used to transfer the energy. Even most wet geothermal
>>>> recirculates the water by re-injection, and there is always loss.
>>> Finally some food for thought.
>>>
>>> I wonder how much loss there would be.
>>
>> **There need only be as much loss as any thermal power plant (coal, 
>> nuclear, et al). The main working fluid need not be water. Water, for the 
>> most part, is just cheap and convenient.
>
> True. Can you name me another fluid able to contain as much heat for 
> transfer at a similar cost?

**Of course not. I can, however, list several fluids which offer BETTER 
performance, for more money. In any case, the working fluid costs are 
similar for nuclear.

>
> The loss of water would be largely as steam in the generators. Most of 
> this may be successfully recaptured. But not all.
>
> I'm not a geothermal expert. If you wish to research a geothermal plant 
> using re-injection technology in a desert environment, I suggest you
> find information on the Garlock Fault Geothermal Plant, run by US Naval 
> Operations at its China Lakes Naval Base, near Ridgecrest, California in 
> the lower Owens Valley. (Don't ask me why we have a Naval Base in the 
> desert. But it is there, and they've run a geothermal plant since 
> 1978-79.)

**Yep. Geo-thermal technology is old and proven.


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <45985661$0$18594$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!nntpserver.com!zeus.nntpserver.com!hydra.nntpserver.com!not-for-mail
References: <en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <12pftgqqjved602@corp.supernews.com> <en9564$pdb$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <45982e40$0$18611$88260bb3@free.teranews.com> <12pglrue2531268@corp.supernews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10c480,5f0137fe89979e1d
X-Google-Thread: 105543,5f0137fe89979e1d
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,5f0137fe89979e1d
X-Google-Thread: 104f8c,5f0137fe89979e1d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,gid105543,gid10df0c,gid104f8c,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!nntpserver.com!zeus.nntpserver.com!hydra.nntpserver.com!not-for-mail
From: "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
Newsgroups: aus.environment.misc,aus.invest,aus.politics,sci.geo.geology
References: <en4jub$rl8$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <12pftgqqjved602@corp.supernews.com> <en9564$pdb$1@news-02.connect.com.au> <45982e40$0$18611$88260bb3@free.teranews.com> <12pglrue2531268@corp.supernews.com>
Subject: Re: What's wrong with geothermal?
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:25:40 +1100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <45985661$0$18594$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Jan 2007 00:31:29 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com