🚀 go-pugleaf

"Cerberus" <styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:Xns9BC96D7B92D14NoneShallPass@127.0.0.1...
> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@home.com> wrote:
>
>> "Cerberus" <styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9BC87C3191C5ENoneShallPass@127.0.0.1...
>>> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@home.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:MPG.241cafbcc8f6a7e8989684@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>> In article <Xns9BC4C90A3B260NoneShallPass@127.0.0.1>,
>>>>> styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com says... <snip>
>>>
>>>>>> > With your bullcrap blustering you bounce back like the moron
>>>>>> > that
>>>>>
>>>>> I mena seriouisly.
>>>>
>>>> Fortunately the word "I" has only one letter in it, otherwise he
>>>> would have fucked up that spelling as well. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> By gum you're a thick one aren't you Spuddles? Are you so fucking
>>> stupid that you completely fail to comprehend Je�us is pointing out
>>> the fundamental irony that your own words apply far better to you
>>> than anyone else that frequents this cesspool?
>>>
>>
>> In your tiny world of self delusion and by Je�us own words of reply
>> to my post, you missed it by a mile, not surprising really.
>
> Words of reply? To _your_ post? I see one reply to your post douchebag,
> containing one word. You can't even follow a properly threaded
> conversation for fucks sake.
>

FFS it should have been "word" of reply, cretin. But then, he who corrects 
others while missing the point should at least be able to spell "plagiarise" 
correctly, if he's aiming for any sort of credibilty while throwing stones 
from his little glass house.


>> You want it so much that you make this shit up in your head and then
>> expect people to swallow, hook line and sinker by the very act of
>> your writing it. Pathetic really and desperate.
>
> My hook was struck Spuddles, deep in those fleshy jowls of yours...
>
>> A true sign of one who seeks attention. Apart from the pithy quips
>> and digs you've made over the months when I've not posted, your
>> seeking of my attention shows your desperation like a bright beacon.
>
> You know Spuddles dear, I feel it is time I pointed out that your oft
> repeated, and most favourite of words does not mean what you think it
> does. I'll leave you to work out which word that is, but here's a hint,
> you have used it twice in this post.
>

Doesn't change the fact that you missed me these many months, and the fact 
that these posts of yours are just an attention seeking sickness of yours.

>> Your mantra of "None Shall Pass!" and your pithy efforts here and
>> serves to show how backed up you must truly be.
>

Your words contain much pith, "pulp" but little else substance.

> If you are going to plgiarise Spuddles, could you at least provide
> correct attribution?
>


Who it came from is of nil importance, it is not copyrighted. The sentiments 
are an accurate observation of your general demeanor.

I await your next bounce back, fuckwit.