🚀 go-pugleaf

"Cerberus" <styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:Xns9BC975B77171ANoneShallPass@127.0.0.1...
> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@home.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Cerberus" <styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9BC96D7B92D14NoneShallPass@127.0.0.1...
>>> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@home.com> wrote:
>>>> "Cerberus" <styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns9BC87C3191C5ENoneShallPass@127.0.0.1...
>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@home.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:MPG.241cafbcc8f6a7e8989684@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>>> In article <Xns9BC4C90A3B260NoneShallPass@127.0.0.1>,
>>>>>>> styx.sentinel.PAY@FERRYMAN.gmail.com says... <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > With your bullcrap blustering you bounce back like the moron
>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I mena seriouisly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fortunately the word "I" has only one letter in it, otherwise he
>>>>>> would have fucked up that spelling as well. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> By gum you're a thick one aren't you Spuddles? Are you so fucking
>>>>> stupid that you completely fail to comprehend Je�us is pointing
>>>>> out the fundamental irony that your own words apply far better to
>>>>> you than anyone else that frequents this cesspool?
>>>>
>>>> In your tiny world of self delusion and by Je�us own words of
>>>> reply to my post, you missed it by a mile, not surprising really.
>>>
>>> Words of reply? To _your_ post? I see one reply to your post
>>> douchebag, containing one word. You can't even follow a properly
>>> threaded conversation for fucks sake.
>>>
>> Well... not to the extent you say, but feel free to use it as ammo
>> against Spuddles :)
>> I couldnt think of anything else to say at the time, so not much
>> significance behind it... beyond me missing not having nigel around
>> to play with at least anyway.
>
> Good Lord! You get stupidier by the minute! The unattributed quote you
> have pitifully pasted into your reply was lifted from message
> <MPG.241df0c59a58f67b98968b@news.x-privat.org> which was posted in
> reply to message <Xns9BC87C3191C5ENoneShallPass@127.0.0.1> and is
> quite cleary *not* a reply to your post.
>
> I thought you had some experience with this Usenet stuff, obviously I
> have given you far more credit than you deserve. Your Outlook Express
> headers should have given it away I suppose. What a fucking amateur!
>
>

You retard.
A key was accidentally held on my keyboard which resulted in a message being 
inadvertently sent prior to proper completion.
But I see that you were hovering over Usenet hanging out for my every word, 
like the cretin that you are.
Then you have the audacity to pick at me for replying within a few hours. I 
now think that you are just a control freak.



> -- 
> Cerberus
>
> None Shall Pass!