Article View: aus.net.access
Article #299Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query
From: Rod Speed
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:42
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:42
47 lines
2833 bytes
2833 bytes
Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote >> Its arguable that there is much point in even bothering to report >> telstra faults, someone is likely to report them eventually and its >> less that clear that when I have reported them to iinet that its >> actually got telstra to look at them sooner, even when its been >> a fault thats unique to my phone exchange etc. > Telstra are not allowed to prioritise retail faults over wholesale faults, or vice-versa, for > competition reasons. I wasnt talking about that, but whether iinet actually reported the problem to telstra. iinet appears to make it hard for their monkeys to report a fault to telstra, presumably so they dont get false reports of a problem with the telstra system. > By having a wholesaler and reporting them to them, you, as a customer, are just adding an > unnecessary layer I cant report a fault to telstra when I'm not using them, stupid. >>> I'm thinking in order to save a few bucks, change to Telstra Homeline Budget (then Telstra get >>> shafted $10 or so bucks) $19.95, and then > They dont get shafted at all >>> I'll have to pay for VoIP $9.95, but hopefully make more savings with 15cent Australia wide >>> calls. >> I dont make enough calls for that to ever pay for itself. >> The absolute vast bulk of calls I make are local or >> 1300/1800 calls. It would be handy to be able to have >> cheap calls to mobiles, but none of the major voips have that. > Because they want the cream Nope, because no one has tried competing in that area yet. It will happen sometime. >> I wouldnt really care that much about pass thru. I'd be >> quite happy for the incoming calls to come in on the >> homeline budget line and just use voip for outgoing. >>> Take two years+ for it to actually pay it off, given low call volumes. > Even its a stupid solution
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 109f97,3cbeb5408757c39e X-Google-Thread: fc9bd,3cbeb5408757c39e X-Google-Attributes: gid109f97,gidfc9bd,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> Newsgroups: aus.net.access,aus.comms Subject: Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:42:21 +1000 Lines: 49 Message-ID: <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net> References: <44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au> X-Trace: individual.net GYHRloa/kELghMDVtea07Qa8q3d4/nUx06nwSv7jY76XSxHN0= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response