🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.net.access
Article #299

Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query

#299
From: Rod Speed
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:42
47 lines
2833 bytes
Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote

>> Its arguable that there is much point in even bothering to report
>> telstra faults, someone is likely to report them eventually and its
>> less that clear that when I have reported them to iinet that its
>> actually got telstra to look at them sooner, even when its been
>> a fault thats unique to my phone exchange etc.

> Telstra are not allowed to prioritise retail faults over wholesale faults, or vice-versa, for 
> competition reasons.

I wasnt talking about that, but whether iinet actually reported
the problem to telstra. iinet appears to make it hard for their
monkeys to report a fault to telstra, presumably so they dont
get false reports of a problem with the telstra system.

> By having a wholesaler and reporting them to them, you, as a customer, are just adding an 
> unnecessary layer

I cant report a fault to telstra when I'm not using them, stupid.

>>> I'm thinking in order to save a few bucks, change to Telstra Homeline Budget (then Telstra get 
>>> shafted $10 or so bucks) $19.95, and then

> They dont get shafted at all

>>> I'll have to pay for VoIP $9.95, but hopefully make more savings with 15cent Australia wide 
>>> calls.

>> I dont make enough calls for that to ever pay for itself.
>> The absolute vast bulk of calls I make are local or
>> 1300/1800 calls. It would be handy to be able to have
>> cheap calls to mobiles, but none of the major voips have that.

> Because they want the cream

Nope, because no one has tried competing in that area yet.

It will happen sometime.

>> I wouldnt really care that much about pass thru. I'd be
>> quite happy for the incoming calls to come in on the
>> homeline budget line and just use voip for outgoing.

>>> Take two years+ for it to actually pay it off, given low call volumes.

> Even its a stupid solution 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 109f97,3cbeb5408757c39e
X-Google-Thread: fc9bd,3cbeb5408757c39e
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f97,gidfc9bd,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: aus.net.access,aus.comms
Subject: Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:42:21 +1000
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net>
References: <44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
X-Trace: individual.net GYHRloa/kELghMDVtea07Qa8q3d4/nUx06nwSv7jY76XSxHN0=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response