Article View: aus.net.access
Article #300Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query
From: Michael
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:47
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:47
50 lines
3235 bytes
3235 bytes
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net... > Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote > >>> Its arguable that there is much point in even bothering to report >>> telstra faults, someone is likely to report them eventually and its >>> less that clear that when I have reported them to iinet that its >>> actually got telstra to look at them sooner, even when its been >>> a fault thats unique to my phone exchange etc. > >> Telstra are not allowed to prioritise retail faults over wholesale >> faults, or vice-versa, for competition reasons. > > I wasnt talking about that, but whether iinet actually reported > the problem to telstra. iinet appears to make it hard for their > monkeys to report a fault to telstra, presumably so they dont > get false reports of a problem with the telstra system. OK >> By having a wholesaler and reporting them to them, you, as a customer, >> are just adding an unnecessary layer > > I cant report a fault to telstra when I'm not using them, stupid. > >>>> I'm thinking in order to save a few bucks, change to Telstra Homeline >>>> Budget (then Telstra get shafted $10 or so bucks) $19.95, and then > >> They dont get shafted at all > >>>> I'll have to pay for VoIP $9.95, but hopefully make more savings with >>>> 15cent Australia wide calls. > >>> I dont make enough calls for that to ever pay for itself. >>> The absolute vast bulk of calls I make are local or >>> 1300/1800 calls. It would be handy to be able to have >>> cheap calls to mobiles, but none of the major voips have that. > >> Because they want the cream > > Nope, because no one has tried competing in that area yet. ??? Why wouldnt they try, its just a different form of long distance minutes They dont compete because they need that cream to prop up the rest Even wonder why calls to UK are 2c/min (etc) while F2M is 30c a min?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<zW0_g.50254$rP1.3770@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 109f97,3cbeb5408757c39e X-Google-Thread: fc9bd,3cbeb5408757c39e X-Google-Attributes: gid109f97,gidfc9bd,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: aus.net.access,aus.comms References: <44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net> Subject: Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query Lines: 53 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: <zW0_g.50254$rP1.3770@news-server.bigpond.net.au> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:47:11 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.228.119.205 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1161337631 60.228.119.205 (Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:47:11 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:47:11 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services