🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.net.access
Article #300

Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query

#300
From: Michael
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:47
50 lines
3235 bytes
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net...
> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>>> Its arguable that there is much point in even bothering to report
>>> telstra faults, someone is likely to report them eventually and its
>>> less that clear that when I have reported them to iinet that its
>>> actually got telstra to look at them sooner, even when its been
>>> a fault thats unique to my phone exchange etc.
>
>> Telstra are not allowed to prioritise retail faults over wholesale 
>> faults, or vice-versa, for competition reasons.
>
> I wasnt talking about that, but whether iinet actually reported
> the problem to telstra. iinet appears to make it hard for their
> monkeys to report a fault to telstra, presumably so they dont
> get false reports of a problem with the telstra system.

OK

>> By having a wholesaler and reporting them to them, you, as a customer, 
>> are just adding an unnecessary layer
>
> I cant report a fault to telstra when I'm not using them, stupid.
>
>>>> I'm thinking in order to save a few bucks, change to Telstra Homeline 
>>>> Budget (then Telstra get shafted $10 or so bucks) $19.95, and then
>
>> They dont get shafted at all
>
>>>> I'll have to pay for VoIP $9.95, but hopefully make more savings with 
>>>> 15cent Australia wide calls.
>
>>> I dont make enough calls for that to ever pay for itself.
>>> The absolute vast bulk of calls I make are local or
>>> 1300/1800 calls. It would be handy to be able to have
>>> cheap calls to mobiles, but none of the major voips have that.
>
>> Because they want the cream
>
> Nope, because no one has tried competing in that area yet.

???

Why wouldnt they try, its just a different form of long distance minutes

They dont compete because they need that cream to prop up the rest

Even wonder why calls to UK are 2c/min (etc) while F2M is 30c a min?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <zW0_g.50254$rP1.3770@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 109f97,3cbeb5408757c39e
X-Google-Thread: fc9bd,3cbeb5408757c39e
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f97,gidfc9bd,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: aus.net.access,aus.comms
References: <44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net>
Subject: Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query
Lines: 53
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <zW0_g.50254$rP1.3770@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:47:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 60.228.119.205
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1161337631 60.228.119.205 (Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:47:11 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:47:11 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services