Article View: aus.net.access
Article #301Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query
From: Rod Speed
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:15
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:15
62 lines
3251 bytes
3251 bytes
Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote >>>> Its arguable that there is much point in even bothering to report >>>> telstra faults, someone is likely to report them eventually and its >>>> less that clear that when I have reported them to iinet that its >>>> actually got telstra to look at them sooner, even when its been >>>> a fault thats unique to my phone exchange etc. >>> Telstra are not allowed to prioritise retail faults over wholesale faults, or vice-versa, for >>> competition reasons. >> I wasnt talking about that, but whether iinet actually reported >> the problem to telstra. iinet appears to make it hard for their >> monkeys to report a fault to telstra, presumably so they dont >> get false reports of a problem with the telstra system. > OK >>> By having a wholesaler and reporting them to them, you, as a customer, are just adding an >>> unnecessary layer >> I cant report a fault to telstra when I'm not using them, stupid. >>>>> I'm thinking in order to save a few bucks, change to Telstra >>>>> Homeline Budget (then Telstra get shafted $10 or so bucks) >>>>> $19.95, and then >>> They dont get shafted at all >>>>> I'll have to pay for VoIP $9.95, but hopefully make more savings with 15cent Australia wide >>>>> calls. >>>> I dont make enough calls for that to ever pay for itself. >>>> The absolute vast bulk of calls I make are local or >>>> 1300/1800 calls. It would be handy to be able to have >>>> cheap calls to mobiles, but none of the major voips have that. >>> Because they want the cream >> Nope, because no one has tried competing in that area yet. > ??? !!!!!!!! > Why wouldnt they try, Because it costs them a lot more to call those numbers. > its just a different form of long distance minutes A much more expensive form. > They dont compete because they need that cream to prop up the rest Nope, they dont compete because those calls cost them much more. > Even wonder why calls to UK are 2c/min (etc) while F2M is 30c a min? Because it costs them a lot more to do the calls to mobiles, stupid.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4psp2uFka82lU1@individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net> <zW0_g.50254$rP1.3770@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 109f97,3cbeb5408757c39e X-Google-Thread: fc9bd,3cbeb5408757c39e X-Google-Attributes: gid109f97,gidfc9bd,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> Newsgroups: aus.net.access,aus.comms Subject: Re: landline, VOIP and ADSL query Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:15:25 +1000 Lines: 64 Message-ID: <4psp2uFka82lU1@individual.net> References: <44fad142@news.comindico.com.au> <44febcf9$0$26737$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4pd3q8Fi1fr5U1@individual.net> <lPRZg.49928$rP1.26216@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <4pqdafFjss6pU1@individual.net> <zW0_g.50254$rP1.3770@news-server.bigpond.net.au> X-Trace: individual.net nPvqbmA7zOcZuzOs6t+e4wousw7fSiQ4NQkzPLICJjISxMjmY= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response