🚀 go-pugleaf

"-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com> wrote in message 
news:Tfs1k.7615$IK1.839@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message news:4845d73e@news.x-privat.org...
>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>> news:4845cd0d@news.x-privat.org...
>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>>> news:4844f9b0$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>>>>> news:4844d4bc@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I'm last in this book.
>>>>>>>> So change your name to aardvark then.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now you nearly went and spoilt it.
>>>>>>> Besides how does changing ones name to aardvark make you last in the 
>>>>>>> book?
>>>>>> It'd cure you of being the last, obviously.
>>>>>> Unless it was a reverse telephone directory, I suppose...
>>>>>>
>>>>> How many people by the name of "aardvark" are listed in the telephone 
>>>>> directory? My guess is none.
>>>> Err, well that would be the point of my suggestion to make you FIRST in 
>>>> the book instead of being last in the book. Wouldn't it?
>>>>
>>>> At least in Australia you would be first... in the U.S, you'd most 
>>>> certainly NOT be first in the book.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Besides all that feldercarb, since when has this been a telephone book?
>>> It reads more like a really bad novel than a telephone book.
>>
>> You did not specify which book.
>
> Yeh I did, "This book".

Six months later, you still suck, Spudley...