🚀 go-pugleaf

"]v[etaphoid" <met@phoid.oom> wrote in message 
news:4847c716$0$30462$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com> wrote in message 
> news:Tfs1k.7615$IK1.839@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>
>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>> news:4845d73e@news.x-privat.org...
>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>> news:4845cd0d@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:4844f9b0$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Je�us" <none@all.org> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>> news:4844d4bc@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>>>>> -=Spudley=- wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I'm last in this book.
>>>>>>>>> So change your name to aardvark then.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now you nearly went and spoilt it.
>>>>>>>> Besides how does changing ones name to aardvark make you last in 
>>>>>>>> the book?
>>>>>>> It'd cure you of being the last, obviously.
>>>>>>> Unless it was a reverse telephone directory, I suppose...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many people by the name of "aardvark" are listed in the telephone 
>>>>>> directory? My guess is none.
>>>>> Err, well that would be the point of my suggestion to make you FIRST 
>>>>> in the book instead of being last in the book. Wouldn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>> At least in Australia you would be first... in the U.S, you'd most 
>>>>> certainly NOT be first in the book.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Besides all that feldercarb, since when has this been a telephone book?
>>>> It reads more like a really bad novel than a telephone book.
>>>
>>> You did not specify which book.
>>
>> Yeh I did, "This book".
>
> Six months later, you still suck, Spudley...
>

To merely "suck" would be a mammoth step up for you, my lonely try hard time 
keeper...