Article View: aus.net.status
Article #4Fwd: Microsoft May Drop Internet Access Business
From: Grant Bayley
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 00:00
88 lines
5252 bytes
5252 bytes
Found this at:
http://www.latimes.com:80/HOME/NEWS/CUTTING/t000049575.html
Gee, wouldn't it be a shame if MSN / On Australia (should that be In Bed
With Telstra?) decided to call it quits out here?
Monday, June 2, 1997
Microsoft May Drop Internet Access Business
Cyberspace: Complaints about poor service, undelivered e-mail and billing
problems have dogged the MSN unit.
By LESLIE HELM, Times Staff Writer
�
SEATTLE--After months of customer complaints about poor service,
undelivered e-mail and incessant billing problems, Microsoft Corp.
executives have begun discussing whether the company should
get out of the Internet service provider business, company sources say.
Microsoft denies it has plans to drop its Microsoft Network business "at this
time." However, Jeff Sanders, marketing manager for MSN, admits he "can't
guarantee" whether Microsoft will be in the Internet access business for
the long term.
In the meantime, Sanders said Microsoft is committed to offering quality
service. "Even if access is not a long-run business," Sanders said, the software
giant still needs to develop the sophisticated billing technology it needs
to sell its online products. "If we are going to do it, we want to do it
right."
There already are signs, however, that Microsoft's focus is on offering MSN
as a content package for other ISPs. MSN will be offered, for example, on the
@Home Network, which is developing a cable modem service for high-speed
Internet access. Deutsche Telecom, Germany's phone monopoly, will offer MSN with
its Internet service.
While the communications side of the Internet is far less important
strategically for Microsoft than the content, pulling out of the ISP
business would nonetheless mark a rare and humbling retreat for the
voracious software giant. If Microsoft does end its role as an ISP
provider, it's unclear whether the company would continue to market its
ISP service and merely subcontract key
functions, or restrict itself to offering the content alone.
Since relaunching MSN as an Internet-based service last year, Microsoft has
rapidly built up the business and now has 2.3 million customers. But with
competition increasing, few firms are making money providing Internet access
service. And Microsoft's own service has repeatedly run into problems. In
April, the company disrupted customers' lives by shutting down its e-mail
service for several days to increase its capacity, prompting a flood of
complaints. In March, customers with addresses starting with the letters T
through Z didn't get mail for days when the server handling those
addresses was temporarily down. And many customers also find Microsoft's
e-mail software hard to use.
Sanders says MSN has worked through its billing and capacity problems and
will install new e-mail software sometime this summer. He also insists the
company is "generating accurate bills."
But tell that to victims of MSN's billing service. Placido Torres of Fresno
says he was shocked to get a $281 bill last fall after signing up for what
he thought was a $19.99 unlimited-use charge. Microsoft agreed to take the
charge off his bill at the time. Sanders then canceled his service. Then
in April Torres received a bill for $386 and in May another bill for $175.
Even Microsoft employees, who are now charged for Internet access over
MSN, are apparently having problems with bills. One employee received a bill for
$4.95 after not receiving any bill at all for months.
"Billing is their Achilles' heel," says Jesse Berst, an editor at ZDNet, an
online technology magazine. An ex-Microsoft manager told Berst he was
having so much trouble getting a response from customer service on an
overbilling matter that he had a friend hand-deliver his message to the
appropriate person at Microsoft. Even then, Microsoft couldn't resolve the
problem and insisted the customer continue to pay his monthly fee, pending
resolution of the issue, Berst said. "The underlying lesson here is that
providing Internet access is not trivial," said Sky Dayton, chairman of
Earthlink Network, a Pasadena-based service provider and MSN competitor.
"You don't do it as a side business."
* * *
Leslie Helm (leslie.helm@latimes.com) covers technology from The Times'
Seattle bureau.
--
__________________________________________________
Grant Bayley
http://mac.unsw.edu.au/ gbayley@geko.net.au
__________________________________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gbayley-0306972055570001@dialup1113.sydney.geko.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10d683,d8c4c3b95c2daba4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public X-Google-Thread: 107651,d8c4c3b95c2daba4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107651,public X-Google-Thread: 112213,d8c4c3b95c2daba4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid112213,public From: gbayley@geko.net.au (Grant Bayley) Subject: Fwd: Microsoft May Drop Internet Access Business Date: 1997/06/03 Message-ID: <gbayley-0306972055570001@dialup1113.sydney.geko.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 246425050 Organization: The AusMac Archive Newsgroups: aus.net.status,aus.net.news,aus.computers.ibm-pc