🚀 go-pugleaf

cjmount@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Christopher Mountford) writes:

> If Rosie has a problem with you then I will and did leave that to
> her. But if any woman feels opressed, I've seen it enough to want to
> help her fight it.

Have you ever stopped to think that perhaps, just maybe, your
knight-in-shining-armour routine could be displaced patriarchy?

Amazing as it may sound to you, women are actually big enough and strong
enough to look after themselves without some patronising shithead
reinforcing the mass-media-imposed victim mentality.

> Even if you were right about everything you said. There has been very
> little real personal backlash against anyone but rosie on these news
> groups in this thread. I have been defending my perception of the
> generic problems faced by women as characterised by what Rosie said
> about how *she* *felt* she had been treated.

Actually, from what i've seen of this thread there has been a fair
amount of well-deserved personal backlash against you as well.

> But I don't take sides with personal arguments.

Then what the fuck are you doing in this thread?  For that is exactly
what you are doing.  Have the guts to admit to yourself what it is you
are doing, rather than hypocritically claiming the high moral ground of
objective arbitrator.  What a joke!

-- 
cas@muffin.apana.org.au

    "Organise a strike in your school or workplace on the grounds that it
     does not satisfy your need for indolence & spiritual beauty."
                              -- Hakim Bey, The Temporary Autonomous Zone