Thread View: austin.eff
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by David Smith
Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00
(fwd) Internet Censors Close to Success: Act Now
Author: David Smith
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00
100 lines
5564 bytes
5564 bytes
> > >Internet Censors Close to Success: Act Now > >By Howard Rheingold >syndicated by King Features >electronic rights: Howard Rheingold >Permission granted to redistribute this column (Internet Censors Close to >Success) freely. > >The religious right is only weeks away from final victory in its battle to >shut American citizens out of the Internet as a medium for uncensored >communication. > >The story so far: The censorship drive began in February, 1995, with the >introduction of S.314, "The Computer Decency Act of 1995" (CDA), by Senator >Jim Exon (D-NE), as part of the much larger telecommunications deregulation >bill, S 652. Senator Leahy (D-VT) countered CDA with "The Family >Empowerment Act," which mandates investigation of technical means for >parents to determine what comes into their homes and schools for their >children to see, according to their own family's values. CDA passed the >Senate on June 14; Leahy's amendment lost. On June 21, opposition to the >Exon amendment was voiced even among prominent Republicans, including >Representative Gingrich (R-GA). > >Rep. Chris Cox (R-CA), and Rep. Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced the "Internet >Freedom and Family Empowerment Act" (HR 1978), offering an approach that >would empower parents, rather than the State, to make decisions abot what >is considered decent in every household. > >The time has come for Congress to choose between competing amendments. >Whether our representatives ultimately go down the road to censorship >advocated by the Exon amendment, or choose the parental empowerment >approach advocated by the Cox-Wyden amendment, depends on the outcome of >the battle for public opinion. In the final weeks of 1995, the campaigns >for and against the CDA are approaching the decisive moment. Unless many >people who favor freedom of expression make telephone calls, write letters, >send faxes, right now, as the pro-censorship forces certainly are doing, >the censors are going to win. > >An extremist minority is pressing for final legislation that is even more >restrictive than the Exon bill. This faction, now openly led by the >religious right, seeks to use criminal and civil penalties to hold all >Americans' online conversations, web pages, public archives to a rigidly >defined standard for decency of content. The bill's zealous backers make it >clear that their interpretation of decency in the new medium is far more >strict than those standards upheld by the Supreme Court in regard to other >forms of speech. > >Discourse on the Net will be restricted to that which is judged suitable >for young children in strict households. The liability issues, if upheld, >will mean the death of the online services industry, which has been growing >explosively. America will hand off yet another native industry to global >competitors. Until and unless the Supreme Court decides thatthe legislation >is unconstitutional, the decency cops, with the full power of the law, will >have their day. > >In October, 1995, Commerce committee chairman Larry Pressler received a >letter signed by The Christian Coalition's Ralph Reed, Eagle Forum's >Phyllis Schafly, the Reverends Donald Wildmon and Louis Sheldon of the >American Family Association and Traditional Values Coalition, and former >Attorney General Edwin Meese, that threw the weight of the top >organizations of the religious right behind legislation that would >establish a Federal decency police and shut down the emerging online >communications industry by making online service providers criminally >liable for the activities of their customers. The battle of the CDA is part >of the sweeping telecommunications deregulation bill (S 652), now >approaching the final stages of Congressional decision-making. > >Call or fax Newt Gingrich's office now (1-202-225-4501 voice; >1-202-225-4656 fax), and cc Senator Robert Dole (R-KS) (1-202-224-6521 >voice; 1-202-228-1245 fax).Tell them you favor the parental control tools >proposed in the Cox-White-Wyden amendment to the chilling and unnecessary >Exon amendment. Tell them that you, not the the Federal government, are the >proper authority to decide what is decent in your household. > >For more information, check web sites http://www.vtw.org/exon/ and >URL:http://www.cdt.org/cda.html . Gopher archives: >gopher://gopher.eff.org/11/Alerts. Via e-mail, send a message to >vtw@vtw.org (put "send alert" in the subject line for the latest alert, or >"send cdafaq" for the CDA FAQ). > >Stay informed, spread the word, make those calls. > >END > >Howard Rheingold hlr@well.com >http://www.wll.com/user/hlr/ >Fax: 415 388 3913 >what it is ----->is------>up to us > David Smith * "We truly believe that even though we live in an evil bladex@bga.com * world, if you can stand up with a stronger will, then you President, EFF-Austin * can't be beaten down. This is the true spirit of the Board of Directors, CTCLU * EFF-Austin member" -- John Woo
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads