🚀 go-pugleaf

[POSTED TO ba.internet - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <rone.crdj8b$1sr5$1@ennui.org> on 4 Jan 2005 00:14:03 -0800, "rone"
<^*&#$@ennui.org> wrote:

>In article <slrncth0bt.2i1p.the@wopr.bestii.com>,
>Sam Habash  <usenet@llama.sf.ca.us> wrote:
>>Maybe the whole of ba.* needs a reorganization, but it might
>>help slightly to at least put Bay Area-themed cellular phone 
>>discussion into a more proper location if we insist on using
>>a ba.* group for it.  I thought of calling it "ba.wireless", 
>>but there would be some overlap with ba.internet, insofar
>>ba.internet is used for the intended purpose as described
>>in the newgroup cmsg, which many would argue is obsolete
>>now.
>
>How about ba.mobile-devices, so it includes discussion of
>not-exactly-cell-phones such as the Sidekick II?  Also, it'll
>forestall pedantry over what exactly constitutes a cell phone.
>
>rone
>and, hey, fourteen characters!

How about ba.internet.mobile?  Except there's no longer enough traffic in
ba.internet to justify splitting it.

-- 
Best regards,
John Navas     <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
     CABLE MODEM/DSL GUIDE:  <http://Cable-DSL.home.att.net/>