Article View: ba.config
Article #127Re: ba.cellular? Or should we call it ba.wireless?
From: Sam Habash
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:52
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:52
19 lines
1320 bytes
1320 bytes
On 2005-01-04, rone <^*&#$@ennui.org> wrote: > How about ba.mobile-devices, so it includes discussion of > not-exactly-cell-phones such as the Sidekick II? Also, it'll > forestall pedantry over what exactly constitutes a cell phone. > > rone > and, hey, fourteen characters! I like it. Other suggestions: Or what about ba.wireless? If wireless services such as EDGE or WiMax take off, it may be worth having something in ba.* space targeted towards the technologies, rather than to particular gadgets.. Plus it has a ring (heh) to it that the longer name doesn't. --Sam
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrnctkmbd.5rc.the@wopr.bestII.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-10!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<slrncth0bt.2i1p.the@wopr.bestii.com> <rone.crdj8b$1sr5$1@ennui.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: ffafb,92b57455a536f620 X-Google-Attributes: gidffafb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-10!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Sam Habash <usenet@llama.sf.ca.us> Newsgroups: ba.config Subject: Re: ba.cellular? Or should we call it ba.wireless? Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:52:08 -0000 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <slrnctkmbd.5rc.the@wopr.bestII.com> References: <slrncth0bt.2i1p.the@wopr.bestii.com> <rone.crdj8b$1sr5$1@ennui.org> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (FreeBSD) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 19