Article View: ba.singles
Article #50514Re: Dating services
From: Chuck Linsley
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1992 01:48
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1992 01:48
43 lines
2586 bytes
2586 bytes
In article <540021@aspen.IAG.HP.COM> howeird@aspen.IAG.HP.COM (Howard Stateman) writes: >rickk@public.BTR.COM (Rick) writes: >>Appreciated the good words about Perfect Strings -- but they're $45 every >>six months, not every year ... that feels kind of expensive to me ... am >>I out of touch with realworld prices, or does that seem high to others, >>too? > >You are out of touch with real-world prices. And reality. The cost of >mailing a monthly flyer, for example, aside from the 29 cents for the >stamp and the two or three cents to make the copy, also includes the >computer on which it is processed, the original printer on which it was >printed, and the wages of the person who composes, prints, copies and mails >the sucker. Not to mention inputting the members' names into the database >and maintaining the membership information. Some quick math: >Say they have 100 members, that's $4500 every six months. Would >you< work, >even half-time, for a mere $750 a month, minus the cost of the computer, >etc. ? Not to disagree with your point, but your numbers are a bit off. They bill themselves as Northern California's largest singles organization, and have a few thousand members. That provides enough revenue to pay staff a decent wage, but also increases the workload to the point where they may have to have several staff people. They also do a significant amount of radio advertising, which costs money. >It's a steal, Rick. Especially compared to some other organizations, which can cost $100's per year. Disclaimer: I have no connection with perfect strings. I hear their ads on the radio frequently, and I once requested their information packet and application, but decided it was not what I was looking for at the time. Chuck Linsley chuckl@chips.com Yes, I'm still here. I've just been too busy to pay much attention to the net for a while. >Howard Stateman howeird@iag.HP.COM [Not an HP spokesman] Congrats on the role in "Man of La Mancha!" My mail to you bounced.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3705@news.chips.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!daver!news.chips.com!chucklReferences:
<1992Jan03.012953.12346cyclone@netcom.COM> <540021@aspen.IAG.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110235,b5a55aba48e4c810 X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-11 13:59:25 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!daver!news.chips.com!chuckl From: chuckl@chips.com (Chuck Linsley) Newsgroups: ba.singles Subject: Re: Dating services Message-ID: <3705@news.chips.com> Date: 11 Jan 92 01:48:28 GMT References: <1992Jan03.012953.12346cyclone@netcom.COM> <540021@aspen.IAG.HP.COM> Organization: Chips and Technologies, San Jose, CA Lines: 43