Re: Portmaster3 in Betrieb genommen.

Article View: backbone.general

Article #3048

#3048

From: Benedikt Stockebrand
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00

19 lines
1278 bytes

lullifax@lapaloma.ruhr.de (Clemens Reifenrath) writes:

> Meine Formulierung war anscheinend mi�verst�ndlich, deshalb
> nochmal anders: Bietet v.120 irgendwelche Vorteile gegen�ber
> x.75 (au�er, da� es die Kommunikation mit dem Portmaster
> erm�glicht ;)?

Ja.  Es gibt daf"ur stabil funktionierende Serverhardware.

> Lest Nachrichten von Clemens!

Vielleicht solltest *Du* mal Postings von Tom und Olaf lesen.

-- 
Ben(edikt)? Stockebrand    Runaway ping.de Admin---Never Ever Trust Old Friends
My name and email address are not to be added to any list used for advertising
purposes.  Any sender of unsolicited advertisement e-mail to this address im-
plicitly agrees to pay a DM 500 fee to the recipient for proofreading services.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <87681ymivh.fsf@devnull.ruhr.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <slrn5ad4cg.96p.oklein@alpha.ruhr.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: GERMAN,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: fd79a,248995d43815fdc2
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd79a,public
From: Benedikt Stockebrand <benedikt@devnull.ruhr.de>
Subject: Re: Portmaster3 in Betrieb genommen.
Date: 1996/12/19
Message-ID: <87681ymivh.fsf@devnull.ruhr.de>
X-Deja-AN: 205169404
sender: usenet@devnull.ruhr.de (Usenet Admin)
references: <slrn5ad4cg.96p.oklein@alpha.ruhr.de>
content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
organization: Yes we're organized
newsgroups: backbone.general

Reply to Parent Message