🚀 go-pugleaf

In <4nvpq2$7dd@news.abs.net> howardl@u1.abs.net (Howard Leadmon)
writes: 
>
>Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>: 
>: Scuuze me... But isn't the whole idea BEHIND the creation of a new
>: newgroup is the fact that the traffic warrents it?
>: 
>: The procedure is to propose a new newsgroup and then give the
rationale
>: behind it's need. From the above, it seems that a new proposed
newgroup
>: would be balt.music (for the discussion of Baltimore area music).
>: 
>: Now it's time to:
>: 
>:    o Convince people that it's needed
>:    o Vote on it.
>
>
>
>Jim, I agree with you 100% on this issue.  It's crazy to go out and 
>create groups because you think it's a good idea.  A discussion on the
>issue needs to be brought up in balt.config (and possibly crossposted
to
>balt.general) as the the need for this group.  If most of the large
site
>admins agree, then it will be created.  I know for a fact that
balt.music
>dosen't exist here...
>
Sorry, but the original post on this stated that it had been posted to
balt.config as a proposal, and no response, yea, nay, or otherwise was
given.  Personally, I think this is an excellent idea for a vital balt.
group and support it.  I have emailed netcom to add it to their
listings. Others should do the same with their ISP.